What is cybersquatting? Cybersquatting, as defined by the Anticybersquatting Consumer Protection Act (15 U.S.C. 1125(d)):
is the registration, trafficking in, or use of a domain name that is either identical or confusingly similar to a distinctive trademark or is confusingly similar to or dilutive of a famous trademark.
In simpler terms, cybersquatting occurs where one registers a domain name containing the trademark of another with the intent to profit from the sale or use of that domain name. Cybersquatting can be devastating to a business. Cybersquatters can divert valuable traffic and, in turn, sales, from a business through the use of the cybersquatted domain name. This is why Congress has seen fit to provide significant remedies to businesses injured by this practice. This includes the ability to obtain up to $100,000 in statutory damages and the transfer of the domain name.
Cybersquatting also applies to domain names that incorporate personal names. Specifically, if you have a valid cause of action if someone registered your name (or something confusingly similar to your name), without your consent and with the specific intent to profit from selling the domain name. Damages in personal name ACPA actions, however, are limited to your costs, attorney fees, and transfer of the subject domain name.
Finally, cybersquatting can also be remedied under the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (UDRP). The UDRP is an arbitration provision that is contained within every registration contract associated with the most top-level domains (i.e. .com, .net, .org). And when you register a domain name, the fine print of your registration agreement will contain provisions regarding this procedure. So, by registering most domain name, you also agree to be subject to the UDRP process. This is not a federal court lawsuit. Rather, it is an administrative proceeding before, in general, by the National Arbitration Forum or the World Intellectual Property Organization. The upside is that the cases are decided much quicker and cheaper. But, the downside is the relief is limited to the transfer of the domain only (no monetary damages).
If you have a cybersquatting issue, contact our expert cybersquatting lawyers. Use the form on this page or call us at 855-473-8474.
Editors note: this page was originally posted in January, 2013. It has been updated for clarity and comprehensiveness.
The answer to this question is complex and nuanced. In the last decade or so, it has become fashionable to insist there is some stark dichotomy between what a trademark is and what a brand is. But the difference is not as stark as some marketers would like you to believe. The traditional definition of […]
Read more about Is a “Trademark” the Same Thing as a “Brand”?
The Circle R and the TM symbols both relate to trademarks and both can be physically placed on products, packaging, advertising materials, websites, etc. The Circle R symbol is an “R” enclosed in a circle (®). While both are trademark-related symbols, there are different eligibility requirements for use, meanings, and implications. Here is a quick […]
Read more about Trademarks: What is the Difference Between the Circle R and TM Symbols?
E-commerce businesses must comply with federal and State-level advertising laws and regulations. This is true of any business. But e-commerce businesses face special challenges because there is a whole array of potential methods of innocently, accidentally, or intentionally violating advertising laws. These include the potential to engage in false and deceptive advertising practices, such as […]
Read more about Is Your E-Commerce Advertising in Compliance With Existing Laws?