CEG TEK Copyright Infringement Notifications

Copyright Infringement

CEG TEK International, also known as Copyright Enforcement Group and copyrightsettlements.com, has undertaken a new copyright infringement notice campaign whereby it has sent hundereds, if not thousands, of notices of infringement under the subject line “Notice of Unauthorized Use of Copyrights Owned by AKM Images / GSI Media.” The only problem: many of these notices have been wrongfully sent to owners of licensed content. These notices demand that the recipient “remit settlement in the amount of $500.00” or otherwise face higher penalties once the matter is “referred to attorneys representing the Work’s owner for legal action.” Presumably this is a reference to Ira M. Siegel, the owner of the Law Offices of Ira M. Siegel located in Beverly Hills, California.

 

If you have been wrongfully targeted by CEG TEK International, contact Revision Legal today for legal representation at 855-473-8474. We are well aware of CEG TEK’s business model and we have been actively watching this issue develop.

 

Oops! We could not locate your form.

Extra, Extra!
Recent Posts

Can I Trademark a Non-English Word or Phrase in the U.S.?

Can I Trademark a Non-English Word or Phrase in the U.S.?

Trademark

Yes, as long as the proposed trademark meets the other requirements for registration. U.S. trademark laws do not require that only the English language can be used for trademarks. However, whatever the language, trademarks must meet the legal requirements, including functionality, distinctiveness, uniqueness, etc. For example, every trademark must function as a trademark in that […]

Read more about Can I Trademark a Non-English Word or Phrase in the U.S.?

California’s Age-Appropriate Design Code Act Declared Wholly Unconstitutional

California’s Age-Appropriate Design Code Act Declared Wholly Unconstitutional

Internet Law

In a new ruling, a California federal judge has declared the entirety of California’s Age-Appropriate Design Code Act (“CAADCA”) to be unconstitutional. Cal. Civ. Code §§ 1798.99.28 et seq. See media report here and the Opinion here. The case is Netchoice, LLC. v. Bonta, Case No. 22-cv-08861-BLF (US N.Dist. Cal, March 13, 2025). The CAADCA […]

Read more about California’s Age-Appropriate Design Code Act Declared Wholly Unconstitutional

Put Revision Legal on your side