DMCA Counter Notice

Copyright Law Internet Law

While DMCA takedown notices are the subject of extensive reporting, the DMCA counter notice process is less discussed. The DMCA counter notice, however, is a vitally important procedural tool that can keep your online content available and potentially keep your business running without interruption.

If you have received a DMCA takedown notice, it is important to respond with a DMCA counter notice that complies with the Act’s strict guidelines, being:

  1. Identification of material that has been removed or to which access has been disabled and the location at which the material appeared before it was removed or access to it was disabled.
  2. A statement under penalty of perjury that the subscriber has a good faith belief that the material was removed or disabled as a result of mistake or misidentification of the material to be removed or disabled.
  3. The subscriber’s name, address, and telephone number, and a statement that the subscriber consents to the jurisdiction of the federal district court for the judicial district in which the address is located. Other provisions apply if the subscriber if outside the United States.
  4. A physical or electronic signature of the subscriber.

Submission of the counter notice will shift the burden back to the original complainant. Specifically, the complainant must file a federal lawsuit within 10 days. If no suit is filed, the host is to make the content available online.

If someone has sent you a DMCA takedown notice in error, it is essential you protect your intellectual property by issuing a DMCA counter notice as soon as possible. Consult with our experienced intellectual property attorneys today by calling 855-473-8474 or completing the form to the right.

Extra, Extra!
Recent Posts

Online Personal Data Privacy: Fight Over Universal Opt-Out Mechanisms

Online Personal Data Privacy: Fight Over Universal Opt-Out Mechanisms

Internet Law

Almost half of the States in the U.S. have enacted some version of an online personal or consumer data privacy statute. The statutes all use a similar framework that requires data collectors and processors to provide notices, obtain consent, and comply with mandates and prohibitions. For example, all of the online data privacy statutes require […]

Read more about Online Personal Data Privacy: Fight Over Universal Opt-Out Mechanisms

9th Circuit Partially Invalidates California’s Age-Appropriate Design Code Act

9th Circuit Partially Invalidates California’s Age-Appropriate Design Code Act

Internet Law

The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals — located in San Francisco — partially struck down California’s Age-Appropriate Design Code Act (“CAADCA”). See Cal. Civ. Code §§ 1798.99.28 et seq. The CAADCA was passed in 2022 by the California State Assembly. The CAADCA was enacted to protect the online privacy of children — persons under the […]

Read more about 9th Circuit Partially Invalidates California’s Age-Appropriate Design Code Act

Put Revision Legal on your side