Equity Crowdfunding in Michigan: The Bad Actor Rule

Crowdfunding Lawyer

Michigan’s equity crowdfunding law, technically referred to as the “Michigan Invests Locally Exemption,” represents a fundamental shift in how businesses can raise capital. The power of turning to the crowd, instead of banks, is an opportunity Michigan businesses have never possessed before.

But, equity crowdfunding in Michigan comes with a number of regulations. One of those regulations is called the “bad actor” rule.

The Bad Actor Rule

The Michigan equity crowdfunding exemption is found at MCL 450.2202a. Subsection 5 states that the exemption does not apply if a number of people affiliated with the issuer or offering are subject to disqualification pursuant to 17 CFR 230.262.

17 CFR 230.262, or Rule 262, is a Securities and Exchange Commission rule that disqualifies certain “bad actors” from using exemptions to the traditional disclosure process involved with the sale of securities. The bad actor disqualification applies to the issuer itself, and its directors, officers, or general partners of the issuer, 10% owner (or more) of the issuer, promoters, and the underwriter and its directors, officers, or partners.

In general, the bad actor rules states that if an individual identified above has been convicted of a felony or misdemeanor in connection with the sale or purchase of a security, a false statement to the SEC, or arising out of the conduct of an underwriter, broker, or investment advisor, the exemptions from the general disclosure and reporting requirements are not available. In other words, issuers with a “bad actor” cannot utilize Michigan’s equity crowdfunding laws.

Preparing an Equity Crowdfunding Campaign

Similar to the list of requirements in making and submitting the disclosure statement, or using a website to facilitate the raising of money online, the bad actor rule is another regulation businesses must be aware of before investing time, money, and effort into a crowdfunding campaign.

To be prepared, you must have a complete understanding of your business partners, including their background with any misconduct in connection with the sale of securities. This requires business owners to conduct a level of due diligence on the individuals involved in the company and its large investors.

Extra, Extra!
Recent Posts

2025 Changes to Trademark Fees

2025 Changes to Trademark Fees

Trademark

There are some significant changes coming to the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) that will affect trademark filings beginning January 18, 2025. These changes include the introduction of the Trademark Center, new fees, and revised application requirements. Here is an overview of the key changes: The USPTO will retire the TEAS system, which […]

Read more about 2025 Changes to Trademark Fees

Automated Decision-Making Technology: California Releases Proposed Regulations

Automated Decision-Making Technology: California Releases Proposed Regulations

Internet Law

In today’s competitive e-commerce landscape, automated decision-making technology is becoming more and more important. From personalized product recommendations to targeted advertising and streamlined logistics, these systems help ecommerce businesses adapt and grow. But new regulations are on the horizon, and these changes could reshape the way e-commerce businesses use automation. The California Privacy Protection Agency […]

Read more about Automated Decision-Making Technology: California Releases Proposed Regulations

FTC Adopts Final “Click to Cancel Rule”

FTC Adopts Final “Click to Cancel Rule”

Internet Law

The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) has issued final amendments to its trade regulation rule concerning negative option plans, also known as the “click to cancel rule.” This rule aims to address widespread deceptive practices that prohibit customers from cancelling services in the same manner in which they signed up. Here’s a detailed summary of the […]

Read more about FTC Adopts Final “Click to Cancel Rule”

Put Revision Legal on your side