Kickstarter’s New Terms of Service Agreement: Complete Your Projects

Crowdfunding Lawyer

Ah, the Terms of Service agreement. The lengthy agreements we all click though without a second thought before using a new app, software, or website. Although most of us do not have 250 hours a year to devote to reading these agreements, they contain important terms that have an impact on your use of the service. As website agreement attorneys, we see this on a daily basis.

Kickstarter, the donation-based crowdfunding platform, recently made an important change to its Terms of Service. Specifically, Kickstarter attempted to address the problem of project creators failing to follow through with the project that backers supported. Kickstarter did not mince words in its new Terms of Service, stating:

The creator is solely responsible for fulfilling the promises made in their project. If they’re unable to satisfy the terms of this agreement, they may be subject to legal action by backers.

Kickstarter also provided alternate ways a creator could fulfill its obligations to its backers, including posting an update as to what work has been done, how the funds were used, and what is preventing them from completing the project as planned.

Kickstarter’s new Terms of Service are effective October 19, 2014 and can be reviewed in total here.

So, Can Backers Now Sue a Project Creator?

Well, backers probably could have sued a project creator that made promises that were not fulfilled before the new Terms of Service. In fact, it has happened before.

But, the new Terms of Service clarify the mutual understanding of the parties. The project creator is under a clear obligation to complete the project and he/she is on notice that legal liability may attach if the project is not completed. However, the lawsuit would still be based on traditional legal grounds of a breach of contract, fraud, or equitable principles.

Does Kickstarter Have any Liability?

According to the Terms of Service, no. Kickstarter disclaims any liability and states it does not oversee the performance of any projects. Kickstarter advises users that their use of the platform is at their own risk.

Conclusion

And that is likely the most useful statement of all. Donating to a Kickstarter project with the promise of receiving an award is a risky proposition. The creator may not live up to expectations and the hassle of a lawsuit may not be worth the limited investment into the project. Study the project, ask questions, and back wisely.

If you are creating a project, however, this should be a clear message: do not make promises you cannot keep. With Kickstarter’s new Terms of Service, starting a project and fraudulently accepting donations may expose creators to real liability.

Extra, Extra!
Recent Posts

Does the AI-Copyright Legal Fight Represent a National Security Threat?

Does the AI-Copyright Legal Fight Represent a National Security Threat?

Copyright

The holders of copyrights for newspapers, magazines, books, and other publications are involved in numerous legal battles with owners of AI modules over alleged copyright infringement. The plaintiff copyright owners claim that the AI large language modules have been trained on huge quantities of copyrighted materials without permission and — most importantly — without payment. […]

Read more about Does the AI-Copyright Legal Fight Represent a National Security Threat?

How Does Buy-Sell Insurance Work For An Owners’ Agreement?

How Does Buy-Sell Insurance Work For An Owners’ Agreement?

Corporate

The owners of most small, closely-held businesses negotiate and sign some form of an “Owner’s Agreement.” An important part of such Agreements is the “Buy-Sell” provisions. These are often some of the most difficult to negotiate. The gist of the buy-sell part of the Owners’ Agreement is to establish the rules for what happens if […]

Read more about How Does Buy-Sell Insurance Work For An Owners’ Agreement?

Status on Social Media Moderation Statutes and Cases

Status on Social Media Moderation Statutes and Cases

Internet Law

Social media content moderation by technology platforms was one of the “hot” legal topics in 2023-2024. Three States — California, Texas, and Florida — passed different statutes to either require more content moderation (California) or to limit such moderation (Texas and Florida). All the statutes, in one way or another, demanded more transparency and information […]

Read more about Status on Social Media Moderation Statutes and Cases

Put Revision Legal on your side