A Competitor is Scraping Your Website Content. Can You Make Them Stop? featured image

A Competitor is Scraping Your Website Content. Can You Make Them Stop?

by John DiGiacomo

Partner

Revision Legal

If you have discovered that a competitor is copying content from your website—product descriptions, images, articles, or other material—and republishing it, you may have legal options to make them stop. Web scraping itself is not categorically illegal, but what the scraper does with your content often is. The critical questions are what was taken, who owns it, and how it is being used. Understanding those factors determines which legal remedies are available.

What Counts as Website Scraping?

Website scraping is the automated process of using software, bots, or scripts to collect information from a website. The tool reads the publicly visible content of a webpage and extracts data from it at scale. Scraping is used for legitimate purposes—price comparison services, academic research, search engine indexing—but it is also used to copy a competitor’s content and republish it without permission.

What makes scraping legally actionable is not the technical act of retrieving the page, but what happens next. When a competitor reproduces your original text, photographs, graphics, product descriptions, or other creative material, the analysis shifts to copyright law, trademark law, and potentially unfair competition law.

What Did Your Competitor Actually Copy?

Before taking any legal action, analyze precisely what was taken. There is a significant legal difference between a competitor independently arriving at similar general descriptions and reproducing your original expression word for word. Copyright law protects original creative expression—not facts, ideas, or general information that exists in the public domain.

Gather and preserve evidence as your first step: save copies of your original pages with URLs and publication dates, take screenshots of the competitor’s pages, and document the similarities side by side. Then consider the following questions:

  • Did they copy photographs or graphics you own or licensed? Original photos and graphics are among the clearest cases of copyright infringement when reproduced without authorization.
  • Did they reproduce your original written content? Product descriptions, articles, guides, and other written material you created are protected by copyright from the moment of creation.
  • Are they using your registered trademarks? If the competitor is displaying your brand name, logo, or other registered marks in a way that could confuse consumers, you may have a trademark infringement claim distinct from any copyright claim.
  • Are they suggesting an affiliation with your business? Implied endorsement or false association can support claims under the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1125(a), even without registered trademark rights.
  • Do your website’s terms of service prohibit unauthorized copying? If users must agree to terms before accessing your site, those terms may create enforceable contract rights against scrapers who violate them.

Copyright Infringement and the DMCA

Original website content—text, images, graphics, and other creative works—is protected by copyright the moment it is created and fixed in a tangible medium. 17 U.S.C. § 102. You do not need to register a copyright to own it, but federal copyright registration has significant practical advantages: it is a prerequisite for filing a federal lawsuit, and if registration occurs before infringement (or within three months of publication), you may be entitled to statutory damages of up to $150,000 per willful infringement and attorney’s fees under 17 U.S.C. § 504–505.

The Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) provides a faster first step. Under 17 U.S.C. § 512, you can send a takedown notice to the hosting provider or platform where the infringing content appears. A properly structured DMCA notice requires the hosting provider to take down the content promptly or risk losing their safe harbor protection. This tool can be effective even before you decide whether to pursue litigation.

Computer Fraud and Abuse Act Considerations

The Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA), 18 U.S.C. § 1030, historically provided another avenue against scrapers who accessed systems “without authorization.” However, the Supreme Court’s decision in Van Buren v. United States, 593 U.S. 374 (2021), narrowed the CFAA’s reach. The Court held that exceeding authorized access means accessing information a person is not entitled to obtain—not simply violating the terms of service of a site the person is otherwise permitted to visit.

For scraping that targets publicly accessible pages without bypassing technical access controls (login walls, CAPTCHAs, rate limits), CFAA claims are now difficult to sustain. That said, if a scraper circumvented authentication systems, rate limiting mechanisms, or other technical barriers, CFAA exposure remains viable. The hiQ Labs v. LinkedIn litigation, which wound through the Ninth Circuit multiple times after Van Buren, underscores how fact-specific these cases remain.

Enforceable Website Terms of Service

One of the most important long-term steps you can take is making sure your website terms of service are enforceable. Terms that clearly prohibit scraping, unauthorized reproduction, and commercial use of website content create a breach-of-contract claim if violated—one that may survive where other theories do not.

However, website terms are not automatically enforceable. Courts evaluate whether users had meaningful notice of the terms and an opportunity to agree to them before proceeding. Terms presented through a “clickwrap” agreement—where users must affirmatively check a box or click “I agree”—are generally enforced. Terms presented only in a footer link (“browsewrap”) face more scrutiny. If your site currently relies on footer-only terms with no affirmative agreement step, they may not be enforceable against a scraper who never saw or agreed to them.

Steps to Take If a Competitor Is Scraping Your Content

If you have identified content theft, a structured response typically begins with the following steps:

  • Document everything. Screenshot the infringing pages, preserve the URLs, capture timestamps, and compare the original and copied versions side by side. This evidence is essential for any subsequent legal action.
  • Send a DMCA takedown notice. If the infringing content is hosted on a platform or third-party host, a properly structured DMCA notice under 17 U.S.C. § 512(c) is often the fastest way to get the content removed.
  • Send a cease-and-desist letter. A formal cease-and-desist letter from an attorney puts the competitor on notice that their conduct is unauthorized and demands they remove the copied material and stop the practice. Many situations resolve at this stage once the other party realizes the material is legally protected.
  • Consider registering your copyrights. If you have not registered the relevant works, filing a copyright registration now preserves litigation options. Registration before infringement (or within three months of publication) is necessary to recover statutory damages and fees.
  • Evaluate litigation if necessary. If the competitor refuses to comply or the copying is causing significant commercial harm, a copyright infringement lawsuit seeking injunctive relief and damages may be appropriate.

The key point is not to assume that because content was publicly visible on your website, competitors are free to copy it. Copyright protection attaches to original content regardless of how it was accessed. If your content was scraped and republished without authorization, you likely have legal options to make it stop.

For more information, contact the experienced e-commerce and copyright attorneys at Revision Legal. You can reach us through the form on this page or call (855) 473-8474.

Extra, Extra!
Related Posts

Your Trademark Application Was Refused: What are Your Options?

Your Trademark Application Was Refused: What are Your Options?

Revision Legal

Receiving a refusal from the USPTO can feel discouraging, but a refusal is not the end of the road. Many trademark applications are initially refused and ultimately succeed. The right path forward depends on why your application was refused, whether the refusal is final or non-final, and what options remain available. The most important thing […]

Read more about Your Trademark Application Was Refused: What are Your Options?

Surveillance Pricing Explained: What Businesses Need to Know

Surveillance Pricing Explained: What Businesses Need to Know

Revision Legal

Retailers and online platforms are increasingly using personal data—your location, browsing history, shopping behavior, and even demographics—to set prices that vary from customer to customer. This practice, known as surveillance pricing, has attracted growing scrutiny from federal and state regulators. If your business uses algorithmic pricing tools or third-party data to inform pricing decisions, you […]

Read more about Surveillance Pricing Explained: What Businesses Need to Know

Online Sales and Refund Policies: What California E-Commerce Businesses Need to Disclose

Online Sales and Refund Policies: What California E-Commerce Businesses Need to Disclose

Revision Legal

If your e-commerce business sells to customers in California, you are subject to a detailed pre-sale disclosure regime that goes beyond typical terms-of-service requirements. California law mandates that sellers make specific disclosures about their business identity, address, and return and refund policies before accepting payment from any California buyer. Failure to comply can expose your […]

Read more about Online Sales and Refund Policies: What California E-Commerce Businesses Need to Disclose

Put Revision Legal on your side