Trade secrets are among the most valuable assets a business can hold. A formula, process, customer list, algorithm, or business strategy that gives your company a competitive edge is only protected if you take active steps to guard it. When someone steals or misappropriates your trade secrets, the damage can be immediate and lasting. Revision Legal’s trade secret lawyers are prepared to act quickly to protect your rights and pursue those who have wrongfully taken your confidential information.
Under the Defend Trade Secrets Act (DTSA), 18 U.S.C. § 1836, a trade secret is any information—including a formula, pattern, compilation, program, device, method, technique, or process—that derives independent economic value from not being generally known and is subject to reasonable measures to maintain its secrecy. The Uniform Trade Secrets Act (UTSA), adopted in some form by 48 states, uses a substantially similar definition.
Common examples of protectable trade secrets include manufacturing processes, proprietary software code, customer databases with pricing history, product formulas, marketing strategies, and financial models. Courts look at two things: whether the information has independent economic value because it is secret, and whether the owner took reasonable steps to protect it.
You cannot win a trade secret misappropriation claim if you did not take reasonable steps to protect the information. Courts examine whether you required employees to sign confidentiality and non-disclosure agreements, restricted access to sensitive information on a need-to-know basis, used password protection and encryption, stamped documents as confidential, and trained employees on confidentiality obligations.
A Revision Legal attorney can help you audit your current trade secret protection practices, identify gaps, and implement a comprehensive protection strategy before a problem arises. It is far easier to protect trade secrets prospectively than to pursue litigation after a breach.
Misappropriation under both the DTSA and the UTSA includes acquisition of a trade secret by improper means—including theft, bribery, misrepresentation, breach of a duty to maintain secrecy, or espionage—and disclosure or use of a trade secret without consent by a person who acquired it through improper means or had reason to know the disclosure was improper.
Misappropriation most often occurs when a departing employee takes confidential files to a new employer, a vendor or contractor uses proprietary information after a relationship ends, or a competitor engages in industrial espionage. In the digital age, misappropriation often involves downloading thousands of files to a personal device or forwarding confidential emails to a personal account.
The DTSA creates a federal civil cause of action for trade secret misappropriation, allowing plaintiffs to file in federal court without needing diversity of citizenship. Available remedies include injunctive relief to prevent ongoing or threatened misappropriation, damages for actual loss and unjust enrichment, and in cases of willful and malicious misappropriation, exemplary damages of up to twice the actual damages plus attorney’s fees.
State law claims under the UTSA and related common law claims may also be available. An important advantage of the DTSA is the ability to seek an ex parte seizure order in extraordinary circumstances—a powerful tool when there is reason to believe the defendant will destroy evidence or flee.
Trade secret protection works best when supported by well-drafted contractual agreements. Non-disclosure agreements (NDAs) establish clear confidentiality obligations. Non-compete and non-solicitation agreements can prevent departing employees from immediately weaponizing trade secrets for a competitor. Revision Legal drafts these agreements with an eye toward enforceability in the relevant jurisdiction, ensuring the protections will hold up when you need them most.
Our trade secret attorneys have experience on both sides of these disputes. We help businesses implement trade secret protection programs, respond rapidly when misappropriation is discovered, pursue emergency injunctive relief, and litigate complex cases involving forensic evidence of digital theft. We also defend companies and individuals who face misappropriation claims.
If you believe your trade secrets have been stolen or disclosed by a competitor or former employee, contact Revision Legal today. Time is critical in trade secret disputes—the longer you wait, the greater the harm and the more difficult it becomes to obtain emergency relief.
Trade secret misappropriation occurs across virtually every industry, but certain sectors generate a disproportionate share of disputes. Technology companies face constant risk from employee departures to competitors, corporate espionage, and insider threats. Manufacturing and process industries hold valuable formulas, processes, and operational methods that represent years of R&D investment. Professional services firms—law firms, accounting firms, consulting firms—hold confidential client data and proprietary methodologies.
The healthcare and pharmaceutical industries are particularly active in trade secret litigation. Drug formulas, clinical trial data, and manufacturing processes can be worth billions of dollars, and the competitive pressure to obtain competitive intelligence through improper means is correspondingly intense. The Defend Trade Secrets Act’s federal jurisdiction and ex parte seizure provisions were specifically designed with high-stakes pharmaceutical and technology disputes in mind.
Modern trade secret cases are fundamentally data cases. When an employee takes confidential files to a competitor, the evidence trail is digital: access logs showing when files were accessed, download records showing what was copied, USB device insertion records, email headers showing files sent to personal accounts, and forensic analysis of personal devices.
Preservation of digital evidence is critical and time-sensitive. Within hours or days of discovering a potential trade secret theft, businesses should work with forensic experts and legal counsel to preserve evidence before it is overwritten, deleted, or otherwise destroyed. Spoliation of evidence—the intentional or negligent destruction of evidence relevant to litigation—can result in severe court sanctions including adverse inference instructions that effectively presume the destroyed evidence showed wrongdoing.
A Revision Legal attorney experienced in trade secret disputes can help coordinate a forensic investigation, advise on evidence preservation procedures, and position your business to seek emergency injunctive relief if warranted by the facts.
When a key employee with access to trade secrets departs—particularly to a direct competitor—a proactive response checklist can protect your interests:
The Defend Trade Secrets Act’s ex parte seizure provision allows a court to order law enforcement to seize misappropriated trade secrets in extraordinary circumstances before the defendant has been given notice. This provision was designed for situations where there is credible evidence that the defendant will destroy, conceal, or immediately deploy misappropriated secrets if given advance warning. Acting quickly through legal counsel can make the difference between preserving and losing your ability to obtain emergency relief.
Contact Revision Legal if you believe trade secrets have been stolen from your business or if you are facing a trade secret misappropriation claim. Our attorneys respond urgently to trade secret emergencies.
Courts have allowed trade secret misappropriation damages based on estimated R&D costs. Here’s what this means for how plaintiffs calculate and prove their damages.
Read more about Trade Secret Damages: R&D Cost Estimates Allowed
Using Zoom and other teleconferencing tools for confidential business discussions creates trade secret risks. Here’s how to protect sensitive information during virtual meetings.
Read more about Teleconferencing Software Trade Secret Risks
Courts disagree on whether trade secret owners must prove actual use of stolen information to prevail on misappropriation claims. Here’s the current state of the legal debate.
Read more about Is Proof of Use Required for Trade Secret Claims?