Cybersquatting and Domain Name Disputes | Internet Lawyers

Cybersquatting Lawyer

What is cybersquatting? Cybersquatting, as defined by the Anticybersquatting Consumer Protection Act (15 U.S.C. 1125(d)):

is the registration, trafficking in, or use of a domain name that is either identical or confusingly similar to a distinctive trademark or is confusingly similar to or dilutive of a famous trademark.

In simpler terms, cybersquatting occurs where one registers a domain name containing the trademark of another with the intent to profit from the sale or use of that domain name. Cybersquatting can be devastating to a business. Cybersquatters can divert valuable traffic and, in turn, sales, from a business through the use of the cybersquatted domain name. This is why Congress has seen fit to provide significant remedies to businesses injured by this practice. This includes the ability to obtain up to $100,000 in statutory damages and the transfer of the domain name.

Cybersquatting also applies to domain names that incorporate personal names. Specifically, if you have a valid cause of action if someone registered your name (or something confusingly similar to your name), without your consent and with the specific intent to profit from selling the domain name. Damages in personal name ACPA actions, however, are limited to your costs, attorney fees, and transfer of the subject domain name.

Cybersquatting Resolution Under the UDRP

Finally, cybersquatting can also be remedied under the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (UDRP). The UDRP is an arbitration provision that is contained within every registration contract associated with the most top-level domains (i.e. .com, .net, .org). And when you register a domain name, the fine print of your registration agreement will contain provisions regarding this procedure. So, by registering most domain name, you also agree to be subject to the UDRP process. This is not a federal court lawsuit. Rather, it is an administrative proceeding before, in general, by the National Arbitration Forum or the World Intellectual Property Organization. The upside is that the cases are decided much quicker and cheaper. But, the downside is the relief is limited to the transfer of the domain only (no monetary damages).

If you have a cybersquatting issue, contact our expert cybersquatting lawyers. Use the form on this page or call us at 855-473-8474.

 

Editors note: this page was originally posted in January, 2013. It has been updated for clarity and comprehensiveness.

Extra, Extra!
Recent Posts

Does the AI-Copyright Legal Fight Represent a National Security Threat?

Does the AI-Copyright Legal Fight Represent a National Security Threat?

Copyright

The holders of copyrights for newspapers, magazines, books, and other publications are involved in numerous legal battles with owners of AI modules over alleged copyright infringement. The plaintiff copyright owners claim that the AI large language modules have been trained on huge quantities of copyrighted materials without permission and — most importantly — without payment. […]

Read more about Does the AI-Copyright Legal Fight Represent a National Security Threat?

How Does Buy-Sell Insurance Work For An Owners’ Agreement?

How Does Buy-Sell Insurance Work For An Owners’ Agreement?

Corporate

The owners of most small, closely-held businesses negotiate and sign some form of an “Owner’s Agreement.” An important part of such Agreements is the “Buy-Sell” provisions. These are often some of the most difficult to negotiate. The gist of the buy-sell part of the Owners’ Agreement is to establish the rules for what happens if […]

Read more about How Does Buy-Sell Insurance Work For An Owners’ Agreement?

Status on Social Media Moderation Statutes and Cases

Status on Social Media Moderation Statutes and Cases

Internet Law

Social media content moderation by technology platforms was one of the “hot” legal topics in 2023-2024. Three States — California, Texas, and Florida — passed different statutes to either require more content moderation (California) or to limit such moderation (Texas and Florida). All the statutes, in one way or another, demanded more transparency and information […]

Read more about Status on Social Media Moderation Statutes and Cases

Put Revision Legal on your side