FTC Clamps Down on False and Misleading Customer Reviews

Internet Law

The Federal Trade Commission has reached an agreement contained in an order that, if adopted, will stop the automobile shipment broker AmeriFreight from publishing biased customer reviews to mislead future customers.

The FTC’s complaint alleges that AmeriFreight purposefully deceives potential customers by providing positive reviews from past customers that were given a discount or paid to write their review. Title 15, Section 45 of the U.S. Code gives the FTC authority to bring actions against entities that “use[] unfair methods of competition in or affecting commerce and unfair or deceptive acts or practices in or affecting commerce.”[1] The same section allows the FTC to issue an injunctive order to stop the unfair practices, but must allow 30 days for a chance for the defendant party to be heard. The Code of Federal Regulations defines endorsements as “any advertising message (including verbal statements, demonstrations, or depictions of the name, signature, likeness or other identifying personal characteristics of an individual or the name or seal of an organization) that consumers are likely to believe reflects the opinions, beliefs, findings, or experiences of a party.”[2] Misleading endorsements are actionable under 15 U.S.C. § 45.[3]

The complaint specifically describes the misleading endorsements. It alleges that AmeriFreight would provide $50 discounts for customers who wrote positive reviews, and would charge $50 extra for those who did not. Further, AmeriFreight would remind customers after delivery of their automobiles to write a review, and offered a $100 cash bonus to the best review of the month. Most egregiously, AmeriFreight would label its reviews as unbiased and would feature the reviews prominently on its website and in its other advertising material.

After receiving the complaint, AmeriFreight and the FTC agreed to a settlement that is encompassed in the proposed order. If adopted, the order will enjoin AmeriFreight from continuing its deceitful practices, and will force the company to keep records of its customer reviews—and provide them to the FTC if requested—for five years. This also includes the option for the FTC to inspect AmeriFreight’s operations. The order further requires that AmeriFreight deliver a copy of the order to all future directors and employees of the company for the next ten years. Finally, the order will dissolve 20 years after its adoption. A violation of the order allows the FTC to bring a suit in federal court against AmeriFreight.

This case marks the first time the FTC has brought an action against a company for misleading customers by misrepresenting online reviews. It stands as a warning to other companies that paying customers to write positive reviews without disclosing that payment to potential customers will not be tolerated.

[1] 15 U.S.C. § 45(a)(2).

[2] 16 C.F.R. § 255(b).

[3] Id. at § 255(a).

Extra, Extra!
Recent Posts

Does the AI-Copyright Legal Fight Represent a National Security Threat?

Does the AI-Copyright Legal Fight Represent a National Security Threat?

Copyright

The holders of copyrights for newspapers, magazines, books, and other publications are involved in numerous legal battles with owners of AI modules over alleged copyright infringement. The plaintiff copyright owners claim that the AI large language modules have been trained on huge quantities of copyrighted materials without permission and — most importantly — without payment. […]

Read more about Does the AI-Copyright Legal Fight Represent a National Security Threat?

How Does Buy-Sell Insurance Work For An Owners’ Agreement?

How Does Buy-Sell Insurance Work For An Owners’ Agreement?

Corporate

The owners of most small, closely-held businesses negotiate and sign some form of an “Owner’s Agreement.” An important part of such Agreements is the “Buy-Sell” provisions. These are often some of the most difficult to negotiate. The gist of the buy-sell part of the Owners’ Agreement is to establish the rules for what happens if […]

Read more about How Does Buy-Sell Insurance Work For An Owners’ Agreement?

Status on Social Media Moderation Statutes and Cases

Status on Social Media Moderation Statutes and Cases

Internet Law

Social media content moderation by technology platforms was one of the “hot” legal topics in 2023-2024. Three States — California, Texas, and Florida — passed different statutes to either require more content moderation (California) or to limit such moderation (Texas and Florida). All the statutes, in one way or another, demanded more transparency and information […]

Read more about Status on Social Media Moderation Statutes and Cases

Put Revision Legal on your side