Not every lawyer who calls themselves an “Internet attorney” actually understands the Internet. Revision Legal’s attorneys are Internet lawyers in the fullest sense: we understand the technology, the business models, and the law that govern the digital world. When you hire us, you are not hiring attorneys who have reluctantly adapted to online practice—you are hiring attorneys who built their practice around it.
Internet law does not exist in a vacuum. It requires fluency in multiple intersecting areas of law—intellectual property, contract, tort, constitutional, and regulatory—applied to a technical environment that most attorneys do not understand at a practical level. A lawyer who does not understand how content delivery networks work, what DNS propagation means, how BitTorrent operates, or why smart contracts behave as they do cannot provide effective legal advice on the questions that matter most to Internet businesses.
Revision Legal’s attorneys understand the technical foundation of the Internet. We know the difference between C++ and Python, how distributed computing architectures create legal jurisdiction questions, how cloud infrastructure affects data privacy obligations, and how crowdfunding platforms structure their relationships with backers and project creators. That technical literacy makes us better lawyers for technology clients.
We handle trademark clearance searches, USPTO applications, office action responses, opposition proceedings, cancellation petitions, and trademark infringement litigation. For Internet businesses, trademark strategy is existential: your domain name, brand, and product names must be defensible, and your use of third-party marks in advertising, keyword campaigns, and metatags must be carefully managed.
We represent both copyright holders and defendants in copyright matters. We have prosecuted and defended infringement claims, filed and responded to DMCA takedown notices, negotiated licensing agreements, and litigated mass BitTorrent copyright cases in federal courts across the country. For content creators and digital publishers, copyright registration and enforcement strategy are foundational business decisions.
We handle UDRP proceedings, Anticybersquatting Consumer Protection Act claims, and domain portfolio risk assessments. Domain name disputes are time-sensitive, and the procedural mechanics of UDRP and ACPA require specific expertise.
False and defamatory statements spread rapidly on the Internet. We help clients identify anonymous speakers, pursue removal of defamatory content, and litigate defamation claims in state and federal courts. We also advise defendants on defenses including truth, opinion privilege, and Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act.
Online businesses need contracts that actually work—not boilerplate repurposed from an offline transaction. We draft and negotiate technology licensing agreements, SaaS contracts, affiliate agreements, influencer contracts, and platform-specific commercial arrangements that address the real risks of online commerce.
A properly drafted terms of service agreement defines your relationship with users, limits your liability, protects your intellectual property, and provides enforceable dispute resolution mechanisms. A privacy policy that complies with the California Consumer Privacy Act, GDPR, and applicable state laws protects your business from regulatory action and user litigation. We draft and audit these documents regularly.
Crowdfunding platforms like Kickstarter, Indiegogo, and Republic each have their own terms of service and legal structures. We advise clients on reward-based crowdfunding, equity crowdfunding under Regulation Crowdfunding (Reg CF), and compliance with applicable securities laws. For startups moving from crowdfunding to institutional investment, we provide continuity of counsel through the full capital formation process.
Revision Legal was built to serve the businesses and individuals who make their living online. We provide direct access to experienced attorneys, transparent pricing, and practical advice that accounts for business reality—not just legal risk. We understand that Internet businesses move fast and that legal decisions often need to be made in hours, not weeks.
Whether you need trademark registration, a contract reviewed, a copyright dispute resolved, or an online reputation problem addressed, Revision Legal has the technical knowledge and legal experience to help. Contact us today for a consultation with an Internet attorney who understands your world.
The phrase “internet lawyer” encompasses a broad range of substantive practice areas that intersect wherever business, creative work, and daily life meet digital networks. Understanding what types of matters internet attorneys handle helps clients identify when they need specialized counsel — and why a general practitioner may not have the technical or doctrinal background these matters require.
False and damaging statements published on review sites, social media platforms, forums, and news aggregators can cause lasting reputational and economic harm. Internet defamation attorneys evaluate whether a statement is actionable, identify the poster through subpoena or platform disclosure, and pursue injunctive relief and damages. Where the poster is anonymous, counsel can seek a John Doe subpoena to the platform or ISP. Where the platform itself is a potential target, § 230 immunity analysis determines what relief is available. The goal is not always litigation — in many cases, a properly documented legal demand achieves faster and more complete removal than a lawsuit.
Internet lawyers represent both rights holders whose content is being pirated, scraped, or republished without authorization, and individuals or businesses accused of infringement. On the enforcement side, this includes filing DMCA takedown notices, pursuing ISP subpoenas, sending cease-and-desist letters, and litigating in federal court. On the defense side, it includes evaluating fair use defenses, responding to CEG-TEK and similar demand letters, challenging DMCA notices sent in bad faith, and defending BitTorrent copyright cases.
Cybersquatting, brand impersonation, and trademark infringement online are endemic problems for companies of all sizes. Internet attorneys file UDRP complaints to recover hijacked domain names, prosecute ACPA claims in federal court, and assist clients in monitoring and enforcing trademark rights across digital channels. For startups, internet lawyers provide clearance opinions on proposed brand names, review trademark registrations, and structure agreements that protect the brand as the business scales.
Every website that collects personal information, enters into user agreements, or hosts third-party content needs properly drafted legal documents. An internet lawyer drafts click-wrap terms of service with enforceable arbitration clauses and limitation-of-liability provisions, privacy policies compliant with CCPA, GDPR, and applicable state laws, and data processing agreements for vendors and service providers. These documents are not merely compliance exercises — they are enforceable contracts that define the legal relationship between the operator and its users.
SaaS agreements, API license agreements, software development contracts, and data licensing arrangements all require careful attention to intellectual property ownership, data rights, warranties, and liability allocation. Internet lawyers negotiate and draft these agreements, structure open-source compliance programs, and advise on the interplay between platform terms and a client’s own contractual rights. For clients acquiring or selling digital businesses, internet attorneys conduct intellectual property diligence and structure the transaction to preserve platform rights, domain ownership, and technology assets.
Facebook agreed to pay $550 million to settle a class action lawsuit under Illinois’ Biometric Information Privacy Act. Here’s what the case means for biometric data law.
Read more about Facebook’s $550M Illinois Biometric Settlement
Seizing an infringer’s domain name is one of the most effective ways to stop IP theft online. Here’s how courts order domain transfers and what rights holders need to show.
Read more about Seizing an Infringer’s Domain to Stop Infringement
Recent court decisions on what counts as an ‘autodialer’ under the TCPA suggest restrictions may be loosening. Here’s what businesses using automated texts need to know.
Read more about TCPA Autodialer Decisions: Are Restrictions Easing?