What is a Concurrent Use Agreement?

Trademark Law

It is a contract between two parties that governs the parties’ use of certain trademarks. These agreements are often referred to by a number of names, and are sometimes called co-existence or consent agreements.

The primary purpose for entering a concurrent use agreement is to permit a mark to achieve registration. For example, lets assume Company A has applied to register its ABCD trademark in connection with its beer. But, Company B already has a registered ABCD mark in connection with its line of specialty whiskey. As a result of Company B’s registered mark, the examining attorney finds there is a likelihood of confusion between the two marks and refuses to register Company A’s mark.

If the parties can reach an agreement, Company A may submit evidence of a concurrent use agreement between the parties to the examining attorney. At its heart, the agreement means Company A and Company B believe there will be no consumer confusion between the marks. These agreements are usually given great deference by the examining attorney.

Terms and Conditions of a Concurrent Use Agreement

Company B holds quite a bit of leverage in this situation as they are not required to agreement to concurrent use agreement at all. As a result, Company B may ask Company A to limit its use of the mark in whole, or only in connection with specific products, or only displayed in a certain manner. Company B may also demand monetary payment.

Concurrent use agreements can be an effective manner to resolve trademark disputes when there is little risk of customer confusion or a negative impact on either side’s intellectual property. The problem is that the cards are almost all in one party’s hands.

If you are facing an office action based on a likelihood of confusion with a registered mark and would like to explore your options for obtaining a concurrent use agreement, contact Revision Legal today by completing the forms on this page or calling 855-473-8474.

Extra, Extra!
Recent Posts

Can I Trademark a Non-English Word or Phrase in the U.S.?

Can I Trademark a Non-English Word or Phrase in the U.S.?

Trademark

Yes, as long as the proposed trademark meets the other requirements for registration. U.S. trademark laws do not require that only the English language can be used for trademarks. However, whatever the language, trademarks must meet the legal requirements, including functionality, distinctiveness, uniqueness, etc. For example, every trademark must function as a trademark in that […]

Read more about Can I Trademark a Non-English Word or Phrase in the U.S.?

California’s Age-Appropriate Design Code Act Declared Wholly Unconstitutional

California’s Age-Appropriate Design Code Act Declared Wholly Unconstitutional

Internet Law

In a new ruling, a California federal judge has declared the entirety of California’s Age-Appropriate Design Code Act (“CAADCA”) to be unconstitutional. Cal. Civ. Code §§ 1798.99.28 et seq. See media report here and the Opinion here. The case is Netchoice, LLC. v. Bonta, Case No. 22-cv-08861-BLF (US N.Dist. Cal, March 13, 2025). The CAADCA […]

Read more about California’s Age-Appropriate Design Code Act Declared Wholly Unconstitutional

Put Revision Legal on your side