McDonalds: Lovin’ Intent to Use Trademarks

Trademark Registration

ABC 7 out of San Francisco reports that McDonalds has filed a new intent to use trademark for “Lovin’ is Greater Than Hatin’.” And while a major corporation’s trademark filing is not necessarily news, it does demonstrate the importance of an intent to use trademark to corporate expansion strategy.

An intent to use trademark allows a company to test two theories: (1) that the trademark in question is distinctive and capable of registration; and (2) that the new trademark is a useful brand name for a new product. With minimal cost, an intent to use trademark application allows a trademark filer to test these theories and to determine whether a given mark is a viable name for a future product–or often a product currently in the works.

Intent to use trademarks, or trademarks filed on a 1(b) basis, go through the standard application process. The intent to use mark is substantively examined by an examining attorney and, if it passes the examining attorney’s scrutiny, a notice of allowance is issued. Once a notice of allowance is issued, an intent to use applicant must show, within six months of the issuance of a notice of allowance, that the applicant is using the mark in commerce in association with the sale of goods or services. In short, an intent to use application allows a company to test the registerability of a proposed trademark before even using it.

This can be helpful in product development. Through extensions, an applicant can obtain an extension of time of up to three years to file a statement of use in response to an intent to use notice of allowance. This allows a company to continue to develop a product without the worry that a competitor will steal its unique brand name during the research or product development phase. For this reason, intent to use trademarks, such as the new McDonald’s filing, and serve as a useful tool for protecting your trademark rights.

Extra, Extra!
Recent Posts

Does the AI-Copyright Legal Fight Represent a National Security Threat?

Does the AI-Copyright Legal Fight Represent a National Security Threat?

Copyright

The holders of copyrights for newspapers, magazines, books, and other publications are involved in numerous legal battles with owners of AI modules over alleged copyright infringement. The plaintiff copyright owners claim that the AI large language modules have been trained on huge quantities of copyrighted materials without permission and — most importantly — without payment. […]

Read more about Does the AI-Copyright Legal Fight Represent a National Security Threat?

How Does Buy-Sell Insurance Work For An Owners’ Agreement?

How Does Buy-Sell Insurance Work For An Owners’ Agreement?

Corporate

The owners of most small, closely-held businesses negotiate and sign some form of an “Owner’s Agreement.” An important part of such Agreements is the “Buy-Sell” provisions. These are often some of the most difficult to negotiate. The gist of the buy-sell part of the Owners’ Agreement is to establish the rules for what happens if […]

Read more about How Does Buy-Sell Insurance Work For An Owners’ Agreement?

Status on Social Media Moderation Statutes and Cases

Status on Social Media Moderation Statutes and Cases

Internet Law

Social media content moderation by technology platforms was one of the “hot” legal topics in 2023-2024. Three States — California, Texas, and Florida — passed different statutes to either require more content moderation (California) or to limit such moderation (Texas and Florida). All the statutes, in one way or another, demanded more transparency and information […]

Read more about Status on Social Media Moderation Statutes and Cases

Put Revision Legal on your side