Grounds for Trademark Opposition and Cancellation Proceedings

Trademark Law

Trademark opposition and cancellation proceedings are administrative proceedings that are similar to a lawsuit in federal court. The first question in any opposition or cancellation proceeding is whether the opposer or petitioner has standing. We reviewed the standards for standing here.

Now we will address the substantive merits of trademark opposition and cancellation proceedings.

Grounds for Opposition

The Lanham Act does not expressly provide for the proper grounds for an opposition,[1] but through judicial interpretation it has been held that once standing is established, an oppose may raise any legal defect or deficient in the application as a grounds for opposition. Usually, this means the opposer will base the opposition on one of the statutory grounds to refuse registration of a trademark in Section 2 of the Lanham Act. As a result, the majority of opposition proceedings are based on the following: descriptiveness, geographical descriptiveness, likelihood of confusion, or no bona fide use in commerce. The Trademark Board Manual of Practice provides a non-exhaustive list of 23 grounds for opposition. See TBMP § 309.03(c).

Grounds for Cancellation

The grounds to cancel a trademark differ depending on whether the complained of mark is less than five years old. If so, the mark may be cancelled for the same reasons the stated in the opposition section above or for specific grounds that may cancel a mark “at any time,” including a claim the mark has become generic, functional, or abandoned.

If the mark has been registered for more than five years, the standard is different. Specifically, claims that the mark is descriptive or creates a likelihood of confusion are no longer possible. Instead, the cancellation must only be based on a claim the registered mark is generic, has been abandoned, was obtained through fraud, or creates a false suggestion of connection, among other rarely used grounds.

Defending Opposition and Cancellation Proceedings

Trademark opposition and cancellation proceedings typically involve extremely complex legal questions and a complete review of all relevant facts. The litigation process is constrained by the rules of procedure, which experienced attorneys can sometimes use to their advantage. To speak with Revision Legal’s trademark attorneys about your opposition or cancellation proceeding, contact us today though the forms on this page or by calling 855-473-8474.

 

[1] § 20:13 McCarthy on Trademarks and Unfair Competition

Extra, Extra!
Recent Posts

The Minnesota Consumer Data Privacy Law: What Businesses Should Know (Part Two)

The Minnesota Consumer Data Privacy Law: What Businesses Should Know (Part Two)

Internet Law

In May 2024, Minnesota enacted the Minnesota Consumer Data Privacy Act (“MCDPA”). In Part One of this two-part article, the Consumer Data Protection Attorneys at Revision Legal discussed the consumer rights and consumer-facing business obligations imposed by the MCDPA, including additional consumer rights related to automated decisions that utilize profiling data. The MCDPA allows consumers […]

Read more about The Minnesota Consumer Data Privacy Law: What Businesses Should Know (Part Two)

Advantages of Forming Corporate Entities for Operating Your Business

Advantages of Forming Corporate Entities for Operating Your Business

Corporate

Under most circumstances, the experienced Business Lawyers at Revision Legal deem it prudent for clients to operate their businesses through a corporate entity like a standard corporation or a limited liability company. Of course, there are some circumstances where a partnership of some type might be the better option, but it would be a rare […]

Read more about Advantages of Forming Corporate Entities for Operating Your Business

The Minnesota Consumer Data Privacy Law: Summary For Consumers

The Minnesota Consumer Data Privacy Law: Summary For Consumers

Internet Law

In May 2024, Minnesota enacted a consumer data privacy statute called the Minnesota Consumer Data Privacy Act (“MCDPA”). About 20 States have enacted consumer data privacy statutes similar to the MCDPA, and the MCDPA follows the general template of those statutes. However, there are some unique and additional features of the MCDPA that are very […]

Read more about The Minnesota Consumer Data Privacy Law: Summary For Consumers

Put Revision Legal on your side