Trademark Trial and Appeal Board Appeal for CARL’S BAR Denied

Trademark Lawyer

A small town Kansas restaurant, which filed a Trademark Trial and Appeal Board appeal in an attempt to register the name “Carl’s Bar,” has been denied by the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (“TTAB”), who ruled it would likely to be confused with and negatively impact fast-food chain, Carl’s Jr.’s trademark. Carl’s Jr. Restaurants LLC initiated the opposition to the Carl’s Bar registration.

The TTAB determined that the similarities between the names and their services were sufficient to warrant concern that the average consumer would be confused by it. While there are more than 1200 Carl’s Jr. restaurants in the United States, Carl’s Bar & Delicatessen is a single entity in Kansas. According to the TTAB this discrepancy doesn’t lessen the likelihood of confusion between the marks.

In making its determination, the TTAB focused on the similarity of the restaurants marks and also the similarity of the services being provided. The TTAB ruled that given that both first words are “Carl’s” and that they are both in possessive form makes them very similar. Moreover, the services each name provides are alike as some Carl’s Jr. restaurants house bars and serve alcoholic beverages.

Finally, the TTAB also takes the fame of the opposer’s mark into account when making an approval determination.  For example, because Carl’s Jr. restaurants sales exceeded $800 million in 2010, and the company spent over $36 million on advertising, the TTAB was convinced that Carl’s Jr. is established in the area around Carl’s Bar & Delicatessen.

In light of those factors the TTAB granted Carl’s Jr.’s motion and denied registration for “Carl’s Bar.”

Extra, Extra!
Recent Posts

Online Personal Data Privacy: Fight Over Universal Opt-Out Mechanisms

Online Personal Data Privacy: Fight Over Universal Opt-Out Mechanisms

Internet Law

Almost half of the States in the U.S. have enacted some version of an online personal or consumer data privacy statute. The statutes all use a similar framework that requires data collectors and processors to provide notices, obtain consent, and comply with mandates and prohibitions. For example, all of the online data privacy statutes require […]

Read more about Online Personal Data Privacy: Fight Over Universal Opt-Out Mechanisms

9th Circuit Partially Invalidates California’s Age-Appropriate Design Code Act

9th Circuit Partially Invalidates California’s Age-Appropriate Design Code Act

Internet Law

The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals — located in San Francisco — partially struck down California’s Age-Appropriate Design Code Act (“CAADCA”). See Cal. Civ. Code §§ 1798.99.28 et seq. The CAADCA was passed in 2022 by the California State Assembly. The CAADCA was enacted to protect the online privacy of children — persons under the […]

Read more about 9th Circuit Partially Invalidates California’s Age-Appropriate Design Code Act

Put Revision Legal on your side