Trademark Trial and Appeal Board Appeal for CARL’S BAR Denied

Trademark Lawyer

A small town Kansas restaurant, which filed a Trademark Trial and Appeal Board appeal in an attempt to register the name “Carl’s Bar,” has been denied by the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (“TTAB”), who ruled it would likely to be confused with and negatively impact fast-food chain, Carl’s Jr.’s trademark. Carl’s Jr. Restaurants LLC initiated the opposition to the Carl’s Bar registration.

The TTAB determined that the similarities between the names and their services were sufficient to warrant concern that the average consumer would be confused by it. While there are more than 1200 Carl’s Jr. restaurants in the United States, Carl’s Bar & Delicatessen is a single entity in Kansas. According to the TTAB this discrepancy doesn’t lessen the likelihood of confusion between the marks.

In making its determination, the TTAB focused on the similarity of the restaurants marks and also the similarity of the services being provided. The TTAB ruled that given that both first words are “Carl’s” and that they are both in possessive form makes them very similar. Moreover, the services each name provides are alike as some Carl’s Jr. restaurants house bars and serve alcoholic beverages.

Finally, the TTAB also takes the fame of the opposer’s mark into account when making an approval determination.  For example, because Carl’s Jr. restaurants sales exceeded $800 million in 2010, and the company spent over $36 million on advertising, the TTAB was convinced that Carl’s Jr. is established in the area around Carl’s Bar & Delicatessen.

In light of those factors the TTAB granted Carl’s Jr.’s motion and denied registration for “Carl’s Bar.”

Extra, Extra!
Recent Posts

2025 Changes to Trademark Fees

2025 Changes to Trademark Fees

Trademark

There are some significant changes coming to the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) that will affect trademark filings beginning January 18, 2025. These changes include the introduction of the Trademark Center, new fees, and revised application requirements. Here is an overview of the key changes: The USPTO will retire the TEAS system, which […]

Read more about 2025 Changes to Trademark Fees

Automated Decision-Making Technology: California Releases Proposed Regulations

Automated Decision-Making Technology: California Releases Proposed Regulations

Internet Law

In today’s competitive e-commerce landscape, automated decision-making technology is becoming more and more important. From personalized product recommendations to targeted advertising and streamlined logistics, these systems help ecommerce businesses adapt and grow. But new regulations are on the horizon, and these changes could reshape the way e-commerce businesses use automation. The California Privacy Protection Agency […]

Read more about Automated Decision-Making Technology: California Releases Proposed Regulations

FTC Adopts Final “Click to Cancel Rule”

FTC Adopts Final “Click to Cancel Rule”

Internet Law

The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) has issued final amendments to its trade regulation rule concerning negative option plans, also known as the “click to cancel rule.” This rule aims to address widespread deceptive practices that prohibit customers from cancelling services in the same manner in which they signed up. Here’s a detailed summary of the […]

Read more about FTC Adopts Final “Click to Cancel Rule”

Put Revision Legal on your side