Whirlpool Corporation Non-Compete Agreements

Multinational corporations, including the Whirlpool Corporation located in Benton Harbor, Michigan, often request (or demand) their employees sign non-compete agreements.
 

What is a non-compete agreement?

 
Non-compete agreements are a contract between an employer and employee. The contract typically restricts an employee’s ability to leave his or her current position to join a similar or competing business. Many times the contract also places restrictions on the use of confidential information obtained through the individual’s current employment.
 

Are non-compete agreements legal?

 
Yes, but there are limits. Non-compete agreements are enforceable to protect the employer’s legitimate business interests and must be reasonable in terms of geographical scope and duration.
 
Often times employers intentionally draft non-compete agreements that cross the line. Whirlpool Corporation has previously drafter and required employees to sign noncompete agreements that, in part, have been ruled unenforceable. See Whirlpool Corp v Burns, 457 F Supp 2d 808 (WD MI 2006).
 

What should you do if required to sign a non-compete agreement?

 
At the very least, you should understand the terms and conditions of the contract by consulting with an attorney. You may be able to edit the contract to clear up ambiguities or obtain additional consideration in exchange for your signature.

 

If you have been asked to sign a non-compete agreement, contact our St. Joseph, Michigan office today at 269-281-3908 or through the form below.
 

Office Action Response

  • American Express
    Discover
    MasterCard
    Visa
    Supported Credit Cards: American Express, Discover, MasterCard, Visa
     


 
 

Extra, Extra!
Recent Posts

Can I Trademark a Non-English Word or Phrase in the U.S.?

Can I Trademark a Non-English Word or Phrase in the U.S.?

Trademark

Yes, as long as the proposed trademark meets the other requirements for registration. U.S. trademark laws do not require that only the English language can be used for trademarks. However, whatever the language, trademarks must meet the legal requirements, including functionality, distinctiveness, uniqueness, etc. For example, every trademark must function as a trademark in that […]

Read more about Can I Trademark a Non-English Word or Phrase in the U.S.?

California’s Age-Appropriate Design Code Act Declared Wholly Unconstitutional

California’s Age-Appropriate Design Code Act Declared Wholly Unconstitutional

Internet Law

In a new ruling, a California federal judge has declared the entirety of California’s Age-Appropriate Design Code Act (“CAADCA”) to be unconstitutional. Cal. Civ. Code §§ 1798.99.28 et seq. See media report here and the Opinion here. The case is Netchoice, LLC. v. Bonta, Case No. 22-cv-08861-BLF (US N.Dist. Cal, March 13, 2025). The CAADCA […]

Read more about California’s Age-Appropriate Design Code Act Declared Wholly Unconstitutional

Put Revision Legal on your side