California: Retailers Must Warn That Digital Goods Can Be Taken Away featured image

California: Retailers Must Warn That Digital Goods Can Be Taken Away

by John DiGiacomo

Partner

Internet Law

California Assembly Bill No. 2426, recently enacted into law, introduces significant amendments to the Business and Professions Code, specifically targeting consumer protection against false advertising in the realm of digital goods. This legislation, approved by the Governor on September 24, 2024, aims to address the misleading practices often associated with the sale of digital goods, such as video games sold through Steam or other platforms. The bill adds Section 17500.6 to the Business and Professions Code, establishing new requirements for sellers of digital goods to ensure transparency and honesty in their advertising practices.

AB 2426 applies to digital applications or games, digital audio works, such as music, digital video, digital books, and digital codes that provide access to books or other content. It specifically prohibits sellers from using terms like “buy,” “purchase,” or any other term that a consumer would understand to mean that they are receiving a digital good without conditions. Said another way, consumers must know that they are not purchasing a digital good, only licensing it.

At the time of sale, sellers must either get confirmation from a consumer at the time of purchase that the consumer knows he or she is receiving a license to access the digital good, along with a complete list of restrictions and conditions of the license, and that access may be unilaterally revoked by the seller if they no longer hold the right to the digital good. Alternatively, sellers can provide a clear and conspicuous statement before executing each transaction, stating in plain language that “buying” or “purchasing” the digital good is a license, and include a method to access the full terms and conditions of the license. These confirmations must be distinct and separate from other terms and conditions of the transaction; they cannot be hidden in an agreement.

There are some exceptions to this requirement. Subscription based-services, free services, or goods that are available for permanent offline download are exempt. The law expands the scope of false advertising to include digital goods, and it imposes new obligations on sellers and provides additional protections for consumers. Violations of these provisions can result in civil penalties and misdemeanor charges, thereby enhancing the enforcement mechanisms available to regulators.

Assembly Bill No. 2426 represents a significant step forward in consumer protection, particularly in the rapidly evolving digital marketplace. By requiring clear and conspicuous disclosures and prohibiting misleading advertising practices, this legislation aims to ensure that consumers are fully informed about the nature of their transactions involving digital goods. This not only enhances consumer trust but also promotes fair competition among sellers by holding them to higher standards of transparency and honesty. As digital goods continue to proliferate, such regulatory measures are crucial in safeguarding consumer interests and maintaining the integrity of the marketplace.

Extra, Extra!
Recent Posts

Can You Claim Your Dietary Supplements are “Healthy” on the Packaging?

Can You Claim Your Dietary Supplements are “Healthy” on the Packaging?

Corporate

The answer is legally complicated since the Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”) has defined the term “healthy” to apply to foods, not dietary supplements. On the other hand, in some circumstances, certain types of oils — like olive oil — are now eligible to use the “healthy” label. Thus, if your supplement is an oil […]

Read more about Can You Claim Your Dietary Supplements are “Healthy” on the Packaging?

Avoiding “Naked” Trademark Licensing With Superior Licensing Agreements

Avoiding “Naked” Trademark Licensing With Superior Licensing Agreements

Trademark

If nurtured properly, trademarks can continue to function indefinitely, bringing continued and increasing value to the owners. There are, however, ways that trademarks can be “lost.” As an example, a trademark can be abandoned through lack of use or can be lost to the general public through the process of genericide. That happens when the […]

Read more about Avoiding “Naked” Trademark Licensing With Superior Licensing Agreements

Put Revision Legal on your side