Defamation Defense Attorney featured image

Defamation Defense Attorney

by John DiGiacomo

Partner

Internet Law

Defaming a business or a person will often result in the filing of a defamation lawsuit. But that does not mean that the person bringing the lawsuit will win. Depending on the facts of the case, a serious and successful defense to a defamation lawsuit can be mounted. You will, of course, need to hire experienced and courtroom-proven defamation defense attorneys like the ones here at Revision Legal. Call us at 231-714-0100. We handle cases across the country.

What is defamation?

Defamation can be either written or verbal. The first is called libel, and the second is called slander. In general, for either type of defamation, the person suing — called the “plaintiff” — must prove the following legal elements:

  • A false statement was made — either in writing or verbally
  • The statement was not privileged in any way
  • Made with at least negligence with respect to the truth or falsity of the statement
  • The statement was published by the maker of the statement to at least one third party
  • The false statement injured the “target” of the statement in some way, like damaging their reputation, injuring them in their trade/occupation, etc.

For some types of defamation, the final element need not be proven. These are called per se defamatory statements. These per se statements include false statements charging a person/business with a crime, impugning a person’s chastity, suggesting a person is diseased, and more.

In addition, for public figures, there is an additional legal element that must be shown: either a knowingly false statement or a statement made with reckless disregard for the truth.

What are Some Defenses to a Defamation Lawsuit?

From the foregoing, we can see several potential legal defenses to a defamation lawsuit. First, as many know, “truth is an absolute defense.” Thus, if it can be shown that the statement was not false, then such will be a successful legal defense.

Second, the statement that is alleged to be false must be a statement of fact. In general, this means that the statement must be a statement that can be verified as true or false. Consequently, statements of opinion and statements that are a form of “puffery” will not constitute defamation. Likewise, mistake and/or materiality can sometimes be a viable defense.

Third, some statements are privileged which means that no defamation lawsuit can be filed with respect to those statements. Examples include statements made in court filings and statements that are authorized and approved by the “target.”

Fourth, while rare, it is sometimes possible to defend a defamation case on the basis of lack of publication. For example, if you send a letter only to the “target,” that is not defamation since there was no publication to a third party. It is still not defamation even if the target shares the letter with others. The publication must be made by the person making the alleged false statement.

Fifth, depending on the applicable law, retraction and/or correction can be a legal defense.

Sixth, if the case involves a public figure, then lack of malice is generally a method of successfully defending against defamation. In fact, public figures find it very difficult under U.S. law to win defamation cases because knowledge or reckless disregard is difficult to prove.

Finally, note that a defense based on the lack of damage or injury is almost never successful. Where damages are not obvious, it is common for the plaintiff to ask for “nominal” damages. Such “nominal” damages might only be $10, but that is enough for the plaintiff to “win.” And in most jurisdictions, if the plaintiff is successful, the plaintiff can be awarded their attorneys’ fees (which can be substantial).

Contact Revision Legal

For more information, call the experienced Defamation Defense Team at Revision Legal today for assistance. You can contact us through the form on this page or call (855) 473-8474.

Extra, Extra!
Recent Posts

Does the AI-Copyright Legal Fight Represent a National Security Threat?

Does the AI-Copyright Legal Fight Represent a National Security Threat?

Copyright

The holders of copyrights for newspapers, magazines, books, and other publications are involved in numerous legal battles with owners of AI modules over alleged copyright infringement. The plaintiff copyright owners claim that the AI large language modules have been trained on huge quantities of copyrighted materials without permission and — most importantly — without payment. […]

Read more about Does the AI-Copyright Legal Fight Represent a National Security Threat?

How Does Buy-Sell Insurance Work For An Owners’ Agreement?

How Does Buy-Sell Insurance Work For An Owners’ Agreement?

Corporate

The owners of most small, closely-held businesses negotiate and sign some form of an “Owner’s Agreement.” An important part of such Agreements is the “Buy-Sell” provisions. These are often some of the most difficult to negotiate. The gist of the buy-sell part of the Owners’ Agreement is to establish the rules for what happens if […]

Read more about How Does Buy-Sell Insurance Work For An Owners’ Agreement?

Status on Social Media Moderation Statutes and Cases

Status on Social Media Moderation Statutes and Cases

Internet Law

Social media content moderation by technology platforms was one of the “hot” legal topics in 2023-2024. Three States — California, Texas, and Florida — passed different statutes to either require more content moderation (California) or to limit such moderation (Texas and Florida). All the statutes, in one way or another, demanded more transparency and information […]

Read more about Status on Social Media Moderation Statutes and Cases

Put Revision Legal on your side