What is a Concurrent Use Agreement?

Trademark Law

It is a contract between two parties that governs the parties’ use of certain trademarks. These agreements are often referred to by a number of names, and are sometimes called co-existence or consent agreements.

The primary purpose for entering a concurrent use agreement is to permit a mark to achieve registration. For example, lets assume Company A has applied to register its ABCD trademark in connection with its beer. But, Company B already has a registered ABCD mark in connection with its line of specialty whiskey. As a result of Company B’s registered mark, the examining attorney finds there is a likelihood of confusion between the two marks and refuses to register Company A’s mark.

If the parties can reach an agreement, Company A may submit evidence of a concurrent use agreement between the parties to the examining attorney. At its heart, the agreement means Company A and Company B believe there will be no consumer confusion between the marks. These agreements are usually given great deference by the examining attorney.

Terms and Conditions of a Concurrent Use Agreement

Company B holds quite a bit of leverage in this situation as they are not required to agreement to concurrent use agreement at all. As a result, Company B may ask Company A to limit its use of the mark in whole, or only in connection with specific products, or only displayed in a certain manner. Company B may also demand monetary payment.

Concurrent use agreements can be an effective manner to resolve trademark disputes when there is little risk of customer confusion or a negative impact on either side’s intellectual property. The problem is that the cards are almost all in one party’s hands.

If you are facing an office action based on a likelihood of confusion with a registered mark and would like to explore your options for obtaining a concurrent use agreement, contact Revision Legal today by completing the forms on this page or calling 855-473-8474.

Extra, Extra!
Recent Posts

2025 Changes to Trademark Fees

2025 Changes to Trademark Fees

Trademark

There are some significant changes coming to the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) that will affect trademark filings beginning January 18, 2025. These changes include the introduction of the Trademark Center, new fees, and revised application requirements. Here is an overview of the key changes: The USPTO will retire the TEAS system, which […]

Read more about 2025 Changes to Trademark Fees

Automated Decision-Making Technology: California Releases Proposed Regulations

Automated Decision-Making Technology: California Releases Proposed Regulations

Internet Law

In today’s competitive e-commerce landscape, automated decision-making technology is becoming more and more important. From personalized product recommendations to targeted advertising and streamlined logistics, these systems help ecommerce businesses adapt and grow. But new regulations are on the horizon, and these changes could reshape the way e-commerce businesses use automation. The California Privacy Protection Agency […]

Read more about Automated Decision-Making Technology: California Releases Proposed Regulations

FTC Adopts Final “Click to Cancel Rule”

FTC Adopts Final “Click to Cancel Rule”

Internet Law

The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) has issued final amendments to its trade regulation rule concerning negative option plans, also known as the “click to cancel rule.” This rule aims to address widespread deceptive practices that prohibit customers from cancelling services in the same manner in which they signed up. Here’s a detailed summary of the […]

Read more about FTC Adopts Final “Click to Cancel Rule”

Put Revision Legal on your side