Michigan’s equity crowdfunding law, technically referred to as the “Michigan Invests Locally Exemption,” represents a fundamental shift in how businesses can raise capital. The power of turning to the crowd, instead of banks, is an opportunity Michigan businesses have never possessed before.
But, equity crowdfunding in Michigan comes with a number of regulations. One of those regulations is called the “bad actor” rule.
The Michigan equity crowdfunding exemption is found at MCL 450.2202a. Subsection 5 states that the exemption does not apply if a number of people affiliated with the issuer or offering are subject to disqualification pursuant to 17 CFR 230.262.
17 CFR 230.262, or Rule 262, is a Securities and Exchange Commission rule that disqualifies certain “bad actors” from using exemptions to the traditional disclosure process involved with the sale of securities. The bad actor disqualification applies to the issuer itself, and its directors, officers, or general partners of the issuer, 10% owner (or more) of the issuer, promoters, and the underwriter and its directors, officers, or partners.
In general, the bad actor rules states that if an individual identified above has been convicted of a felony or misdemeanor in connection with the sale or purchase of a security, a false statement to the SEC, or arising out of the conduct of an underwriter, broker, or investment advisor, the exemptions from the general disclosure and reporting requirements are not available. In other words, issuers with a “bad actor” cannot utilize Michigan’s equity crowdfunding laws.
Similar to the list of requirements in making and submitting the disclosure statement, or using a website to facilitate the raising of money online, the bad actor rule is another regulation businesses must be aware of before investing time, money, and effort into a crowdfunding campaign.
To be prepared, you must have a complete understanding of your business partners, including their background with any misconduct in connection with the sale of securities. This requires business owners to conduct a level of due diligence on the individuals involved in the company and its large investors.
In May 2025, as part of a settlement of litigation involving college football, a new entity was created called the College Sports Commission (“CSC” or “Commission”). See news media reports here and here. Among many other purposes, the CSC will monitor and approve name, image, and likeness (“NIL”) agreements for college athletes. As the term […]
Read more about Fairness Factors For Your College NIL Agreement
Trademarks are words, designs, symbols, logos, and other things that are used/associated with goods or services that identify the specific commercial source of the goods/services. COCA-COLA, APPLE, and GUCCI are just a few famous examples. If COCA-COLA is on the bottle, consumers know what to expect from the beverage in the bottle. The same for […]
Read more about Is a “Fanciful” Trademark the Best Type of Trademark?
Getting an endorsement deal as a social media influencer may be a seminal event financially and for the progress of your career. However, the question always has to be asked whether your endorsement deal is fair. In other words, are you getting paid what you are worth? There are a number of factors that can […]
Read more about Is Your Social Media Influencer Endorsement Deal Fair?