In a strange copyright infringement case, the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals has ruled that MMS, the text messaging standard, is not an illegal file sharing service and, therefore, cell phone carriers cannot be held liable for vicarious copyright infringement for the forwarding of copyrighted MMS messages. Luvdart, a company that produces greetings and stylized messages containing video, photos, and audio, alleged that Verizon, AT&T, and Sprint could be held liable for profiting from the facilitation of the copyright infringement of Luvdart’s copyrighted messages. In short, Luvdart alleged that these carriers allowed users to forward Luvdart’s copyrighted MMS messages to third parties in violation of Luvdart’s copyright license agreement.
A three judge panel of the 9th Circuit ruled that Luvdart failed to state a claim upon which relief can be granted and upheld the lower court’s decision to dismiss the case. In affirming the lower court’s dismissal of the case, the 9th Circuit held that Luvdart failed to show that the carriers had specific knowledge that copyright infringement occurred on their respective networks. Specifically, the Court stated, “Luvdarts’s conclusory allegations that the Carriers had the required knowledge of infringement are plainly insufficient.” The Court also rejected Luvdart’s argument that the carriers were responsible for “willful blindness,” namely, that they took specific actions to avoid learning about infringement on their networks. And the Court took issue with validity of Luvdart’s purported notices under the Digital Millennium Copyright Act: “The notices were 150-page-long lists of titles, apparently just a transcription of every title copyrighted by Luvdarts, which indicated that they wanted “accountability” for the unauthorized distribution of those titles for the period from May 2008 to November 2009.”
What does this mean for you? Simply put, your phone carrier will not be held liable for copyright infringement simply because it allows users to forward MMS messages.
There are some significant changes coming to the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) that will affect trademark filings beginning January 18, 2025. These changes include the introduction of the Trademark Center, new fees, and revised application requirements. Here is an overview of the key changes: The USPTO will retire the TEAS system, which […]
Read more about 2025 Changes to Trademark Fees
In today’s competitive e-commerce landscape, automated decision-making technology is becoming more and more important. From personalized product recommendations to targeted advertising and streamlined logistics, these systems help ecommerce businesses adapt and grow. But new regulations are on the horizon, and these changes could reshape the way e-commerce businesses use automation. The California Privacy Protection Agency […]
Read more about Automated Decision-Making Technology: California Releases Proposed Regulations
The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) has issued final amendments to its trade regulation rule concerning negative option plans, also known as the “click to cancel rule.” This rule aims to address widespread deceptive practices that prohibit customers from cancelling services in the same manner in which they signed up. Here’s a detailed summary of the […]
Read more about FTC Adopts Final “Click to Cancel Rule”