Copyright First Sale Doctrine: Supreme Court Upholds Sale of Foreign-Made Goods

The US Supreme Court has ruled that the copyright first sale doctrine not only applies to goods lawfully purchased within the United States, but also to goods lawfully purchased in foreign countries. The copyright first sale doctrine states that the rights of the copyright holder are cut off upon the first lawful sale of a product. In the case of Kirtsaeng v. John Wiley and Sons, however, the US Supreme Court was asked whether the first sale doctrine applies where an individual first lawfully purchased the product in question in a foreign market. And, in response, the Supreme Court answered, “Yes.”

 

Many Internet businesses purchase their products in overseas market, where companies often sell those products for cheaper prices, and then resell those products at a lower cost in the US market. This idea, called parallel importation, allows retailers to purchase products at cheaper prices in the international markets. Prior to this ruling, the manufacturers of the products, who are the copyright owners of the creative works embodied in the products, have pursued parallel importers for copyright infringement. In the case in question, Kirtsaeng was charged with importing copyrighted textbooks that were lawfully purchased in a foreign market.

 

What does this mean for you? This decision legalizes the business models of many Internet retailers, who have secretly imported legitimate products from overseas markets. This also likely means that copyright owners will need to rethink their pricing strategies in foreign and domestic markets. As always, if you intend to participate in parallel importation or believe that you fall under the first sale doctrine, contact an attorney for an analysis of your business model to ensure that you are not subjecting yourself to unnecessary risk.

Extra, Extra!
Recent Posts

Does the AI-Copyright Legal Fight Represent a National Security Threat?

Does the AI-Copyright Legal Fight Represent a National Security Threat?

Copyright

The holders of copyrights for newspapers, magazines, books, and other publications are involved in numerous legal battles with owners of AI modules over alleged copyright infringement. The plaintiff copyright owners claim that the AI large language modules have been trained on huge quantities of copyrighted materials without permission and — most importantly — without payment. […]

Read more about Does the AI-Copyright Legal Fight Represent a National Security Threat?

How Does Buy-Sell Insurance Work For An Owners’ Agreement?

How Does Buy-Sell Insurance Work For An Owners’ Agreement?

Corporate

The owners of most small, closely-held businesses negotiate and sign some form of an “Owner’s Agreement.” An important part of such Agreements is the “Buy-Sell” provisions. These are often some of the most difficult to negotiate. The gist of the buy-sell part of the Owners’ Agreement is to establish the rules for what happens if […]

Read more about How Does Buy-Sell Insurance Work For An Owners’ Agreement?

Status on Social Media Moderation Statutes and Cases

Status on Social Media Moderation Statutes and Cases

Internet Law

Social media content moderation by technology platforms was one of the “hot” legal topics in 2023-2024. Three States — California, Texas, and Florida — passed different statutes to either require more content moderation (California) or to limit such moderation (Texas and Florida). All the statutes, in one way or another, demanded more transparency and information […]

Read more about Status on Social Media Moderation Statutes and Cases

Put Revision Legal on your side