SEC Rule 147 and the Michigan Invests Locally Exemption

Crowdfunding Lawyer

Michigan Invests Locally Exemption

We have written repeatedly on Michigan’s new crowdfunding regulations established as the Michigan Invests Locally Exemption (“MILE”). Whether you like them or not, the MILE regulations take aim at striking a balance between permitting new avenues of equity-driven fundraising, while seeking to protect its participants from unscrupulous offerors.

MILE only applies, however, to strictly intrastate equity offerings. Interstate equity-crowdfunding activity, on the other hand, is subject to oversight by the Federal Securities and Exchange Commission.

SEC Rule 147

Rule 147 (see 17 CFR 230.147) is nicknamed the “safe harbor” exemption because it outlines how the SEC analyzes whether or not a company’s activities are intrastate, and thus free from its oversight when engaging in equity sales via crowdfunding.

A company’s “safe harbor” is obtained when it demonstrates (1) its residency within the state; (2) a significant amount of its business is conducted within the state; (3) and all offers or sales are made only to residents of the state. Let’s review the three main requirements:

  1. Residency is demonstrated by a company’s organization within the state or by the company stationing its principal place of business within the state.
  2. 80% Rule: The offering company must derive at least 80% of its gross revenues from the state; have at least 80% of its assets located in the state prior to any offering; use at least 80% of the net proceeds of the exempt offering to operate its business in the state; and have its principal office located in the state.
  3. The offering company can only offer and sell securities to residents of the chosen state.

What effect do the Safe Harbor provisions have on MILE?

The requirements of Rule 147, particularly that of the so-called 80% rule, demonstrate the SEC’s intention to narrowly limit the application of its “safe harbor” rule. The fact is that unless your business is hyper-local (e.g. a restaurant, bar, etc.) and intends to earn a substantial measure of its revenue, and reinvest any earnings, within the state, your business must pay close attention to whether or not it qualifies for the Rule 147 “safe harbor” exemption – or whether it must comply with SEC regulations of financial offerings beyond those enumerated in MILE.

In short, crowdfunding is a new and fluid area of the law and you should be reluctant to risk the equity and control of your business without first consulting competent legal counsel. The attorneys at Revision Legal are well-versed in the nuances of crowd-funding regulations and would be glad to help you determine how to move forward with your planned equity offering and whether your business qualifies for Rule 147’s “safe harbor” provision.

Extra, Extra!
Recent Posts

Worrying About SaaS Agreements and Cross-Border Data Transfers

Worrying About SaaS Agreements and Cross-Border Data Transfers

Internet Law

When your business is contemplating a software-as-a-service (“SaaS”) agreement, there are a large number of considerations. An SaaS agreement is, of course, a subscription service where a software package is centrally hosted and accessed by a SaaS company’s customers. Issues to be aware of include: As important as the foregoing issues are, one often overlooked […]

Read more about Worrying About SaaS Agreements and Cross-Border Data Transfers

FAQs About Legal Services for Social Media Influencers, Bloggers, and Online Content Creators

FAQs About Legal Services for Social Media Influencers, Bloggers, and Online Content Creators

Internet Law

If you are serious about your career as a social media influencer, blogger, and/or online content creator, you ARE going to need legal services at some point. Online creation is big business now, and big business means the need for legal services. The Internet and Social Media Attorneys at Revision Legal are here to help. […]

Read more about FAQs About Legal Services for Social Media Influencers, Bloggers, and Online Content Creators

Take it Down Act: Ban on “Revenge Porn” Goes National

Take it Down Act: Ban on “Revenge Porn” Goes National

Internet Law

Congress recently passed the Take It Down Act (“TIDA”), and the law was signed by the President in mid-May 2025. See AP media report here. Interestingly enough, “Take It Down” is an acronym for “Tools to Address Known Exploitation by Immobilizing Technological Deepfakes on Websites and Networks Act.” TIDA prohibits what is commonly called “revenge […]

Read more about Take it Down Act: Ban on “Revenge Porn” Goes National

Put Revision Legal on your side