Misappropriation of the Right of Publicity featured image

Misappropriation of the Right of Publicity

by John DiGiacomo

Partner

Corporate

Misappropriation of publicity involves the unauthorized use of someone’s name, likeness, and/or identifiable personality traits without authorization. A lawsuit can be filed against someone or a business for doing this. Misappropriation of publicity is similar to lawsuits that can be filed for misappropriation of name and likeness. The difference is that, in most states, misappropriation of publicity applies only to sufficiently famous persons. The underlying idea is that a truly famous person can “monetize” their name and likeness. Likewise, the authority to use their name and likeness can be sold for commercial gain. Thus, allowing some person or business to use a famous person’s name and likeness with authorization (and payment) is a form of theft.

In other states — such as Texas — misappropriation of publicity is only for those who are deceased and lasts for fifty years after the person’s death. Tex. Property Code Ann. § 26. The right of publicity is designated by statute as a property right that can be sold, assigned, or bequeathed in the manner of other property before death. Either the Estate, the assignees, or the heirs of the decedent are the proper parties to sue if the right of publicity is misappropriated in jurisdictions like Texas. If you think you have a case for misappropriation of publicity, contact us here at Revision Legal. Our number is (231) 714-0100. We are proven litigators specializing in internet law and protecting intellectual property rights.

What Must be Proven?

Like other types of misappropriation, three legal elements must be shown to win a lawsuit. These legal elements are:

  • Use of a person’s name, likeness, or other identifiable characteristics
  • Said use was without authorization or legal exception — such as for fair use or to identify a person in a news article, for example
  • Said use was for the other party’s advantage or attempt to gain an advantage — such as use in marketing for commercial advantage

Note that it is not generally required that the third-party unauthorized user obtains the benefit sought (like sales and profits) and it is not necessary for the person suing to show any damage or loss of some advantage (like sales or profits).

An identifiable personal characteristic can be about anything. In one case, Bette Midler was able to win a misappropriation of publicity case when an advertiser used a singer who sounded like Midler in a TV commercial. Midler’s voice is unique and identifiable.

What Happens if a Person/Business is Found Guilty of Misappropriation of Publicity?

If a person or business is found guilty of misappropriation of publicity, monetary damages can be awarded and a court order can be issued prohibiting any further misappropriation and/or abuse of an individual’s name, voice, signature, or likeness. Money damages can be based on statutory damages. In Texas, the statutory damages are actual damages or $2,500. Money damages can also include the disgorgement of any profits made by the unauthorized user, punitive damages, and reasonable attorney’s fees and court costs.

Contact Revision Legal For more information, call Revision Legal at 231-714-0100. We are internet and social media influence attorneys with proven experience with IP protection, misappropriation cases, and complex litigation. We are lawyers specializing in internet law.

Extra, Extra!
Recent Posts

2025 Changes to Trademark Fees

2025 Changes to Trademark Fees

Trademark

There are some significant changes coming to the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) that will affect trademark filings beginning January 18, 2025. These changes include the introduction of the Trademark Center, new fees, and revised application requirements. Here is an overview of the key changes: The USPTO will retire the TEAS system, which […]

Read more about 2025 Changes to Trademark Fees

Automated Decision-Making Technology: California Releases Proposed Regulations

Automated Decision-Making Technology: California Releases Proposed Regulations

Internet Law

In today’s competitive e-commerce landscape, automated decision-making technology is becoming more and more important. From personalized product recommendations to targeted advertising and streamlined logistics, these systems help ecommerce businesses adapt and grow. But new regulations are on the horizon, and these changes could reshape the way e-commerce businesses use automation. The California Privacy Protection Agency […]

Read more about Automated Decision-Making Technology: California Releases Proposed Regulations

FTC Adopts Final “Click to Cancel Rule”

FTC Adopts Final “Click to Cancel Rule”

Internet Law

The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) has issued final amendments to its trade regulation rule concerning negative option plans, also known as the “click to cancel rule.” This rule aims to address widespread deceptive practices that prohibit customers from cancelling services in the same manner in which they signed up. Here’s a detailed summary of the […]

Read more about FTC Adopts Final “Click to Cancel Rule”

Put Revision Legal on your side