On February 26, 2015, the Federal Communications Commission voted to preempt state laws that restrict a municipality’s ability to expand outside its territory.
This started when the City of Wilson, North Carolina and Chattanooga, Tennessee wanted to provide broadband service to residents of neighboring towns. They complained to the FCC that because of their state laws, providing this service was impossible.
The FCC agreed that these state laws, which exist in one form or another in 19 other states, conflict with the Federal Telecommunications Act of 1996. Specifically, Section 706 of the Telecommunications Act directs the FCC to take action to remove barriers to broadband investment and competition. As a result, state laws that act as barriers to expansion are preempted and unenforceable.
What Does the Federal Preemption of State Laws Restricting Broadband Mean for Michigan?
In 2005, Michigan passed a law that placed restrictions on a municipality’s ability to provide telecommunication services. Specifically, MCL 484.2252 permits a municipality to provide telecommunications services within its boundaries, provided it has issued a request for competitive bids and has received less than 3 qualified bids within 60 days.
Because of the FCC ruling, it is clear that MCL 484.2252’s limitation on providing telecommunication services within a municipality’s boundary is suspect at best. Equally at risk are the provisions requiring a bid process before a municipality can move forward with its own investment.
Municipalities considering the option of investing in telecommunication services, including providing broadband, should see the FCC’s ruling as a win. For more information on municipal broadband issues, please contact us today.
The holders of copyrights for newspapers, magazines, books, and other publications are involved in numerous legal battles with owners of AI modules over alleged copyright infringement. The plaintiff copyright owners claim that the AI large language modules have been trained on huge quantities of copyrighted materials without permission and — most importantly — without payment. […]
The owners of most small, closely-held businesses negotiate and sign some form of an “Owner’s Agreement.” An important part of such Agreements is the “Buy-Sell” provisions. These are often some of the most difficult to negotiate. The gist of the buy-sell part of the Owners’ Agreement is to establish the rules for what happens if […]
Social media content moderation by technology platforms was one of the “hot” legal topics in 2023-2024. Three States — California, Texas, and Florida — passed different statutes to either require more content moderation (California) or to limit such moderation (Texas and Florida). All the statutes, in one way or another, demanded more transparency and information […]
