Internet of Things Series Part II: Security Concerns

Business Law Revision Legal

For many devices used today, a certain amount of personal information needs to be provided for the device or application to function properly. For example, to get more accurate information from fitness trackers, the user often needs to provide details about their height, weight, gender, activity level, and so forth. We’ve already addressed the possible privacy concerns associated with providing this information – selling data to third parties, data falling into the wrong hands, etc. The security concerns focus on who can gain access to this information, and what can we do to prevent it.

In an article by CMS Wire they reported that 80 percent of these devices failed to require adequate passwords, often resulting in users having no or very weak passwords. The same study reported that 70 percent of devices used unencrypted networks for transferring the data. This means that data is being transferred without any form of protection that would keep it from being picked up by the average computer hacker. Other security concerns the study found included the need for improved user interfaces that weren’t so easy to be hacked and the use of encryption when users download updates for their devices. Without this encryption, hackers can gain access to the user’s profile while an update is being downloaded and installed.

The positive side of this is that with all of these security concerns being raised and brought to the forefront, many companies are taking action now to make changes and protect their users’ private information moving forward. In addition to steps being taken by companies producing these devices, a not-for-profit organization has been established known as the Internet of Things Security Foundation (IoTSF). The IoTSF works to raise awareness and provides resources to companies to help them discover the vulnerabilities and flaws in their devices and correct them.

For more information regarding the IoT and the security concerns stemming from the open flow of data among these devices contact Revision Legal’s Internet attorneys through the contact form or call 855-473-8474.

Image credit to Flickr user reynermedia

Extra, Extra!
Recent Posts

Can I Trademark a Non-English Word or Phrase in the U.S.?

Can I Trademark a Non-English Word or Phrase in the U.S.?

Trademark

Yes, as long as the proposed trademark meets the other requirements for registration. U.S. trademark laws do not require that only the English language can be used for trademarks. However, whatever the language, trademarks must meet the legal requirements, including functionality, distinctiveness, uniqueness, etc. For example, every trademark must function as a trademark in that […]

Read more about Can I Trademark a Non-English Word or Phrase in the U.S.?

California’s Age-Appropriate Design Code Act Declared Wholly Unconstitutional

California’s Age-Appropriate Design Code Act Declared Wholly Unconstitutional

Internet Law

In a new ruling, a California federal judge has declared the entirety of California’s Age-Appropriate Design Code Act (“CAADCA”) to be unconstitutional. Cal. Civ. Code §§ 1798.99.28 et seq. See media report here and the Opinion here. The case is Netchoice, LLC. v. Bonta, Case No. 22-cv-08861-BLF (US N.Dist. Cal, March 13, 2025). The CAADCA […]

Read more about California’s Age-Appropriate Design Code Act Declared Wholly Unconstitutional

Put Revision Legal on your side