How Much Do Data Breaches Cost Businesses?
Data breaches cost businesses millions in fines, lawsuits, and lost customers. Learn the true financial impact and how to reduce your risk.
Read more about How Much Do Data Breaches Cost Businesses?
Partner
The Quest Diagnostics data breach is one of the most significant health care entity security hacks of 2016. In late November, Quest Diagnostics, a medical laboratory company used by countless health care entities nationwide, announced that it had recently identified itself as a victim of a data breach. According to the company, an unauthorized third party gained access to Quest Diagnostics’ computer systems and compromised patient information kept in the system by exploiting security weaknesses in an internet application called MyQuest by Care360.
The health and personal information of more than 34,000 patients who used the MyQuest by Care360 application were exposed in the Quest Diagnostics data breach. Personal identifying information, such as patient name, dates of birth, telephone numbers, health information, and laboratory test results, was just some of the patient information that was compromised in the data security breach. No credit card, debit card, insurance, or other financial information was exposed in the attack, nor were any patient Social Security numbers disclosed as part of the hack.
Upon identifying the hack, Quest Diagnostics took immediate steps to contain the intrusion into their system, and began addressing the vulnerabilities in their internet application that were used by the hackers to compromise patient data. Even though there has been no indication that the exposed data has been misused in any way, victims of the Quest Diagnostics data breach are being notified in compliance with applicable data breach notification laws.
Healthcare data is a particularly attractive target for cyber hackers. Patient information obtained from a healthcare entity is not easy to change once a hack has been detected. Unlike information stolen from a bank or financial institution where new passcodes or cards can be issued to restore the security of the system, healthcare data is permanent information that does not change. Healthcare data systems are also packed with vulnerabilities because federal law required that all healthcare entities adopt electronic health records for their patients in a relatively short period of time, and many entities did not have sufficient time to implement secure and protected systems that were fully vetted for security vulnerabilities.
Healthcare data breaches like the Quest Diagnostics incident trigger a dense web of legal obligations under federal law. Any covered entity — a term that includes healthcare providers, health plans, and healthcare clearinghouses — and any business associate of a covered entity that experiences a breach of protected health information (PHI) must comply with the HIPAA Breach Notification Rule, 45 C.F.R. §§ 164.400–414.
HIPAA’s definition of protected health information is broad. PHI encompasses any individually identifiable health information that is created, received, maintained, or transmitted by a covered entity or its business associate in connection with the provision of healthcare, payment for healthcare, or operations of a healthcare entity. This includes names, dates (including birth dates), telephone numbers, geographic identifiers, and any information that relates to the past, present, or future physical or mental health condition of an individual — exactly the categories of data that were exposed in the Quest Diagnostics breach.
The definition under 45 C.F.R. § 160.103 covers 18 specific categories of identifiers. Notably, even a combination of relatively innocuous data elements — name and date of birth, for example — constitutes PHI when linked to health information. The practical effect is that almost any data exposed in a healthcare application breach will qualify as PHI subject to the Breach Notification Rule.
When a covered entity or business associate discovers a breach of unsecured PHI, the Breach Notification Rule imposes three notification requirements:
The Office for Civil Rights (OCR) at HHS enforces HIPAA and is authorized to impose civil monetary penalties (CMPs) for violations of the HIPAA Privacy Rule, Security Rule, and Breach Notification Rule. The penalty structure, established at 42 U.S.C. § 1320d-5 and implemented through regulations at 45 C.F.R. Part 160, Subpart D, imposes penalties on a tiered basis depending on the covered entity’s culpability:
OCR has pursued enforcement actions resulting in settlements well into the millions of dollars against healthcare entities that failed to implement adequate security measures or failed to conduct required risk assessments. A covered entity that never performed a security risk analysis of a patient-facing application — such as MyQuest by Care360 — faces heightened penalty exposure under the willful neglect tiers.
Healthcare breaches frequently involve business associates — third-party vendors that handle PHI on behalf of covered entities. Quest Diagnostics’ application was a patient-facing tool that by definition collected and transmitted PHI. The vendor that developed and maintained the MyQuest application qualifies as a business associate under 45 C.F.R. § 160.103, and as a business associate is directly subject to the HIPAA Security Rule and Breach Notification Rule. Business associates can be directly investigated and penalized by OCR independent of the covered entity with which they contract.
The legal arrangement between a covered entity and a business associate must be documented in a Business Associate Agreement (BAA), which must specify the permitted uses and disclosures of PHI and must require the business associate to implement appropriate safeguards, report breaches to the covered entity, and comply with applicable HIPAA rules. A covered entity that works with a business associate without a compliant BAA faces independent HIPAA liability for that structural failure.
HIPAA sets a federal floor for healthcare privacy, but many states have enacted healthcare privacy statutes that impose additional requirements. California’s Confidentiality of Medical Information Act, Cal. Civ. Code § 56 et seq., imposes strict liability on providers and their contractors for negligent disclosures of medical information and authorizes civil penalties of up to $250,000 per violation, as well as private civil claims for nominal and compensatory damages. New York’s Public Health Law § 18 imposes independent patient record access and confidentiality requirements. Healthcare entities operating in multiple states must account for both the HIPAA floor and any more demanding state law requirements in their security and breach response programs.
Revision Legal represents healthcare entities, business associates, and patients affected by healthcare data breaches. If your organization has experienced a HIPAA breach or you have been notified that your healthcare information was exposed, contact the data breach attorneys at Revision Legal today.
Data breaches cost businesses millions in fines, lawsuits, and lost customers. Learn the true financial impact and how to reduce your risk.
Read more about How Much Do Data Breaches Cost Businesses?
Ransomware dominated 2020’s biggest data breaches. A look at the most damaging incidents and the cybersecurity lessons every business should learn.
Read more about Top Data Breaches of 2020: Ransomware on the Rise
Data collected during the COVID pandemic for one purpose cannot simply be repurposed. Here’s what businesses need to know about the legal risks.
Read more about Repurposing Pandemic Data: Legal Risks Businesses Face