Who Do I Sue if I Don’t Know Who Defamed? featured image

Who Do I Sue if I Don’t Know Who Defamed?

by John DiGiacomo

Partner

Defamation that takes place online is a big problem in the Internet Age. Chat rooms, message boards, and websites like Facebook and Twitter don’t always require users to provide their real names, which can make finding someone online a real challenge. So what happens when a victim of online defamation doesn’t actually know who defamed them?

Defamation Claims

Defamation and false light claims are important tools to protect people’s reputations and privacy. They allow individuals who have suffered harm caused by another individual’s lies or half-truths to sue. Generally, one can stop the defamer from defaming, and can many times collect monetary damages if they can prove their reputation suffered measurable losses.

In order to bring a defamation claim, the plaintiff must show that (1) the defendant made a false and defamatory statement concerning the plaintiff and (2) the defendant made an unprivileged publication to a third party. Additionally, in order to recover monetary damages, the plaintiff must show a monetary injury.

Unknown Defamer

In the Internet Age, a lot of defamation occurs online. Social media sites allow users to connect to almost anyone, as well as write to, and about, almost anyone. This has led to a swelling of online defamation lawsuits.

But the biggest problem with defamation that occurs online is identifying the defamer. Many social media sites, group forums, and message boards do not require a user to input their actual name. And many of these sites, in order to protect the privacy of their users, do not make user information available to other users. This creates a cyclical problem—users know they are protected, so they are more cavalier in what they say and write, and when their targets cannot identify them to bring legal action, the offenders continue to defame, sometimes to a greater extent.

Filing a Lawsuit with an Unknown Defendant

Luckily, there is still a simple way to bring a defamation lawsuit, even if you do not know who the defamer is. 

Step 1: File a “John Doe” Complaint

The legal system allows a plaintiff to bring what is called a “John Doe suit,” in which the plaintiff sues “John Doe” as opposed to someone’s legal name. This allows the plaintiff the opportunity to find the defendant using the discovery process. However, the plaintiff must still make a reasonable effort to locate the name of the defamer before discovery commences.

Step 2: Subpoenas

Plaintiff may send out subpoenas to the website where the defamation took place (Facebook, for example) seeking the identity of the defamer. Depending on the facts of the case, this may result in a name. Many times, it will result in an IP address. If this happens, the plaintiff must also subpoena the Internet Service Provider (ISP) of that IP address. Depending on the ISP, this may result in a name. But many ISPs, including Time Warner and Comcast, are subject to the Cable Privacy Act, and cannot disclose personally identifiable information.

When it comes to writing these subpoenas, most jurisdictions in the U.S. follow the Dendrite standard, which requires a plaintiff, in a defamation case with an unknown defendant, to show the following:

  1. an attempt to provide notice to the anonymous defendants that their identities are being sought, and explain how to present a defense;
  2. quote verbatim the allegedly actionable online speech;
  3. allege all elements of the cause of action;
  4. present evidence supporting the claim of violation; and
  5. prove to the court, on balance and in the particulars of the case, the right to identify the speaker outweighs the First Amendment right of anonymous speech.

See Dendrite Intern., Inc. v. Doe No. 3, 775 A.2d 756 (2001).

Step 3: Motion for a Court Order

Should a plaintiff fail with the ISP, it can move to get a court order requiring the ISP to identify the defamer by releasing the personal information associated with the IP address. The plaintiff must prove to the court that it took all reasonable steps to identify the defamer, and that it failed. This can be shown with emails, WHOIS search results, and other online investigative documents, as well as copies of the subpoenas and the responses to them.

Conclusion

While tougher, it is not impossible for someone who has been defamed online to bring a successful lawsuit against an unknown defamer. Because of the extra procedural hurdles involved, it is important to have a good attorney who knows the law and understands how the law operates in cyberspace. If you have been defamed online, or have been accused of defamation, contact one of our expert Internet Defamation Attorneys at 855-473-8474.

 

Extra, Extra!
Recent Posts

2025 Changes to Trademark Fees

2025 Changes to Trademark Fees

Trademark

There are some significant changes coming to the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) that will affect trademark filings beginning January 18, 2025. These changes include the introduction of the Trademark Center, new fees, and revised application requirements. Here is an overview of the key changes: The USPTO will retire the TEAS system, which […]

Read more about 2025 Changes to Trademark Fees

Automated Decision-Making Technology: California Releases Proposed Regulations

Automated Decision-Making Technology: California Releases Proposed Regulations

Internet Law

In today’s competitive e-commerce landscape, automated decision-making technology is becoming more and more important. From personalized product recommendations to targeted advertising and streamlined logistics, these systems help ecommerce businesses adapt and grow. But new regulations are on the horizon, and these changes could reshape the way e-commerce businesses use automation. The California Privacy Protection Agency […]

Read more about Automated Decision-Making Technology: California Releases Proposed Regulations

FTC Adopts Final “Click to Cancel Rule”

FTC Adopts Final “Click to Cancel Rule”

Internet Law

The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) has issued final amendments to its trade regulation rule concerning negative option plans, also known as the “click to cancel rule.” This rule aims to address widespread deceptive practices that prohibit customers from cancelling services in the same manner in which they signed up. Here’s a detailed summary of the […]

Read more about FTC Adopts Final “Click to Cancel Rule”

Put Revision Legal on your side