E-Commerce Package Protection May Violate Insurance Law featured image

E-Commerce Package Protection May Violate Insurance Law

by John DiGiacomo

Partner

Internet Law

E-commerce business owners often look for ways to increase their cart size to in turn increase the revenue of their business. Many resort to adding package protection, a form of warranty or guaranty that a package will arrive undamaged. However, many of these package protection products may run afoul of state insurance law.

E-commerce merchant liability typically ends when a package is handed over to a transportation carrier, such as UPS, USPS, or Fed Ex. In turn, the carrier’s liability typically ends upon delivery of the product to the consumer’s residence. However, there has been an increase in “porch pirates,” those who steal delivered products from a consumer’s porch. Theft of a product from a consumer’s porch is an incident considered beyond the carrier’s control, leaving the consumer with the risk. If the package costs less than the consumer’s homeowners insurance, it may not be worth making a claim. E-commerce merchants, therefore, have offered package protection to fill this gap.

However, package may run afoul of insurance regulations. To provide insurance under many state laws, a party must be licensed by the state in which the insurance is provided. Insurance is typically defined as a contractual agreement to assume any risk of loss outside of the consumer’s control, and package protection often meets this definition.

Some companies, such as Route, have stepped in to fill this gap. Route has particularly raised millions of dollars in capital, which allows it to seek licensing to provide licensed insurance services in a number of states.

If you offer package protection, it is worth speaking with one of our e-commerce attorneys to determine if you need to be registered as a licensed provider of insurance under state law.

Extra, Extra!
Recent Posts

Does the AI-Copyright Legal Fight Represent a National Security Threat?

Does the AI-Copyright Legal Fight Represent a National Security Threat?

Copyright

The holders of copyrights for newspapers, magazines, books, and other publications are involved in numerous legal battles with owners of AI modules over alleged copyright infringement. The plaintiff copyright owners claim that the AI large language modules have been trained on huge quantities of copyrighted materials without permission and — most importantly — without payment. […]

Read more about Does the AI-Copyright Legal Fight Represent a National Security Threat?

How Does Buy-Sell Insurance Work For An Owners’ Agreement?

How Does Buy-Sell Insurance Work For An Owners’ Agreement?

Corporate

The owners of most small, closely-held businesses negotiate and sign some form of an “Owner’s Agreement.” An important part of such Agreements is the “Buy-Sell” provisions. These are often some of the most difficult to negotiate. The gist of the buy-sell part of the Owners’ Agreement is to establish the rules for what happens if […]

Read more about How Does Buy-Sell Insurance Work For An Owners’ Agreement?

Status on Social Media Moderation Statutes and Cases

Status on Social Media Moderation Statutes and Cases

Internet Law

Social media content moderation by technology platforms was one of the “hot” legal topics in 2023-2024. Three States — California, Texas, and Florida — passed different statutes to either require more content moderation (California) or to limit such moderation (Texas and Florida). All the statutes, in one way or another, demanded more transparency and information […]

Read more about Status on Social Media Moderation Statutes and Cases

Put Revision Legal on your side