Impact of New DOJ Web Accessibility Final Rule featured image

Impact of New DOJ Web Accessibility Final Rule

by John DiGiacomo

Partner

Internet Law

The legal debate concerning website and app accessibility for those who are visually and hearing impaired has been ongoing for at least a decade. Accessibility is accomplished with software coding embedded in the base structure of a website/app providing an audio description of visual content and a visual explanation of audio content. The software and tech support are now widespread and common.

Legally, the general rule now is that, if a website or app is used to “drive traffic” to a physical location, then the website or app must be accessible to the visual/hearing impaired. This is a compromise related to the federal Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”) which prohibits discrimination in public accommodations. If a store or restaurant, for example, invites the public to enter and enjoy their premises, then the premises must be accessible to those, for example, who cannot walk.

The legal debate has centered around the fact that the ADA speaks in terms of physical locations. Of course, websites and apps are not physical locations, existing as they do on the internet and on wireless connectivity. So, the legal question was whether the ADA applies to websites. As noted above, the answer is “no” unless the website (or app) has a direct and significant connection to a physical location. Driving consumer traffic to a physical location is an example.

These legal rules have now applied to private businesses for a decade or more in some locations. Now, the federal Department of Justice (“DOJ”) has passed a Final Rule applying the web accessibility legal rules to State and county governments. See the fact sheet here. By mid-2026 (or, in some cases, by early-2027), State and county websites and apps must be web-accessible.

The DOJ’s Final Rule fits squarely within the legal rules described above. State and county governments provide a number of important services which are generally located at various physical places in the community. Further, and maybe most importantly, as governmental entities, these physical locations are places where people can — and do — exercise various constitutionally protected rights like those of speech, assembly, and petitioning. Voting is another essential and important task that is associated with physical locations. Thus, under the legal principles set forth above, it is reasonable for the DOJ to require web and app accessibility for State and county governments. The web and app content is definitely used to direct residents to physical locations where important activity occurs.

Another legally interesting aspect of the new DOJ Final Rule is that it mandates use of certain privately-created and maintained technical standards. These are called the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG). Moreover, the DOJ Final Rule requires use of WCAG Version 2.1, Level AA. In the past, there have been legal debates about whether such privately-created standards are appropriate for use in ADA litigation. The courts have generally rebuffed such arguments. Likely, the new DOJ Final Rule solidifies the WCAG as the proper standard.

Contact the Web Accessibility Attorneys at Revision Legal

For more information, contact the experienced Web Accessibility Lawyers at Revision Legal. You can contact us through the form on this page or call (855) 473-8474.

Extra, Extra!
Recent Posts

Does the AI-Copyright Legal Fight Represent a National Security Threat?

Does the AI-Copyright Legal Fight Represent a National Security Threat?

Copyright

The holders of copyrights for newspapers, magazines, books, and other publications are involved in numerous legal battles with owners of AI modules over alleged copyright infringement. The plaintiff copyright owners claim that the AI large language modules have been trained on huge quantities of copyrighted materials without permission and — most importantly — without payment. […]

Read more about Does the AI-Copyright Legal Fight Represent a National Security Threat?

How Does Buy-Sell Insurance Work For An Owners’ Agreement?

How Does Buy-Sell Insurance Work For An Owners’ Agreement?

Corporate

The owners of most small, closely-held businesses negotiate and sign some form of an “Owner’s Agreement.” An important part of such Agreements is the “Buy-Sell” provisions. These are often some of the most difficult to negotiate. The gist of the buy-sell part of the Owners’ Agreement is to establish the rules for what happens if […]

Read more about How Does Buy-Sell Insurance Work For An Owners’ Agreement?

Status on Social Media Moderation Statutes and Cases

Status on Social Media Moderation Statutes and Cases

Internet Law

Social media content moderation by technology platforms was one of the “hot” legal topics in 2023-2024. Three States — California, Texas, and Florida — passed different statutes to either require more content moderation (California) or to limit such moderation (Texas and Florida). All the statutes, in one way or another, demanded more transparency and information […]

Read more about Status on Social Media Moderation Statutes and Cases

Put Revision Legal on your side