Fighting Revenge Porn

Prior to the advent of the Internet, it was significantly harder to distribute non-consentual adult photographs and videos. Physical photographs and video tapes could only be shown to a small group of people. The increase in the speed of communications, however, has brought with it new perils for women and men subject to non-consentual pornography, or what many have termed, revenge porn.

 

Revenge porn is defined as adult content posted to the Internet without the consent of one or more participants. With the enactment of Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, which provides blanket immunity to websites that allow for user generated uploads or submissions, revenge porn has unfortunately become a viable business model. After a breakup, jilted ex-lovers often upload private and potentially embarrassing photos to these websites in an attempt to harass the targeted ex-partner.

 

Revision Legal’s revenge porn attorneys have helped victims of revenge porn on numerous occasions. If you are the victim of revenge porn, there are several civil or criminal causes of action that may apply, such as:

 

  • Copyright infringement, provided you are the photographer or have received an assignment of rights;
  • Intrusion upon seclusion;
  • False light invasion of privacy;
  • Harassment;
  • Stalking;
  • Intentional infliction of emotional distress; and
  • Negligent infliction of emotional distress.

 

If you are the victim of revenge porn, it is important that you contact an attorney immediately. Once a photograph or video has been indexed by third party tube, photo, or other aggregator websites, it becomes increasingly difficult to control the problem because the content can quickly spread. Consequently, it is important that you do not wait to address the issue, as it is unlikely to go away.

 

If you are a revenge porn victim, contact us today.

Extra, Extra!
Recent Posts

Does the AI-Copyright Legal Fight Represent a National Security Threat?

Does the AI-Copyright Legal Fight Represent a National Security Threat?

Copyright

The holders of copyrights for newspapers, magazines, books, and other publications are involved in numerous legal battles with owners of AI modules over alleged copyright infringement. The plaintiff copyright owners claim that the AI large language modules have been trained on huge quantities of copyrighted materials without permission and — most importantly — without payment. […]

Read more about Does the AI-Copyright Legal Fight Represent a National Security Threat?

How Does Buy-Sell Insurance Work For An Owners’ Agreement?

How Does Buy-Sell Insurance Work For An Owners’ Agreement?

Corporate

The owners of most small, closely-held businesses negotiate and sign some form of an “Owner’s Agreement.” An important part of such Agreements is the “Buy-Sell” provisions. These are often some of the most difficult to negotiate. The gist of the buy-sell part of the Owners’ Agreement is to establish the rules for what happens if […]

Read more about How Does Buy-Sell Insurance Work For An Owners’ Agreement?

Status on Social Media Moderation Statutes and Cases

Status on Social Media Moderation Statutes and Cases

Internet Law

Social media content moderation by technology platforms was one of the “hot” legal topics in 2023-2024. Three States — California, Texas, and Florida — passed different statutes to either require more content moderation (California) or to limit such moderation (Texas and Florida). All the statutes, in one way or another, demanded more transparency and information […]

Read more about Status on Social Media Moderation Statutes and Cases

Put Revision Legal on your side