Patent and Intellectual Property Law: Freedom to Operate (“FTO”) Analysis featured image

Patent and Intellectual Property Law: Freedom to Operate (“FTO”) Analysis

by John DiGiacomo

Partner

Patent

Under US patent law, the owner of a patent has the exclusive right for the duration of the patent to manufacture, market, sell, and license the invention that is protected by the patent. This is similarly true for patents issued by patent offices in foreign countries. If you violate someone else’s patent, you can be sued for patent infringement. Losing a patent infringement case can be very expensive. For example, Apple, Inc., owned various design and utility patents related to its smartphone. Samsung was accused of violating those patents when Samsung began selling its own smartphone. Apple sued Samsung for patent infringement and, recently, a jury returned a verdict for Apple and awarded $533 million dollars in damages for patent infringement against Samsung.

A freedom to operate analysis can help avoid potential infringement

While a patent will protect an invention, it will not protect a similar invention as long as the similar invention is sufficiently different. Of course, it can be difficult to determine whether a new invention is “sufficiently different” from the patented invention. That is why it is necessary to conduct what is called a freedom to operate (“FTO”) analysis before manufacturing, marketing and selling a new product. The purpose of a FTO analysis is to help ensure that your making and selling your new product will not infringe on existing and pending patents. Often, a FTO analysis will also evaluate whether other intellectual property rights might be infringed like trade secrets, trademarks, copyrights, etc.

The most cost-effective time to have an FTO analysis conducted is early in the process of developing new products. This saves money since, if “problems” are discovered, then research and development can be shifted towards less legally risky paths. Remember that patents cover machines and devices, but also processes, methods, technologies and designs. Further, your new product does not have to completely infringe existing IP — a portion of your new product might infringe and/or the infringement might be partial since many patents have multiple patent claims.

How is a FTO analysis conducted?

Experienced and knowledgement patent attorneys can provide a FTO analysis for a fee. The process involved an analysis of various documents relevant to your new product including issued patents and pending patent applications. These documents include the patent applications and their supporting documentation. Often, a review of technical publications is conducted. The “goal” is to obtain a legal opinion that your new product does not infringe any existing patents or patents that are pending.

What are my options if potential infringement is discovered?

A FTO analysis might uncover potential infringement dangers. However, there are options if potential infringement is discovered. As noted above, one option is to have your R&D department “invent around” the potential infringement with a new process or method or design, etc. Another option is to purchase the patent or seek a licensing agreement from the patent owner. With a license, typically, a licensing fee will be required, but that cost may be reasonable and might be less expensive than any “work around” (same with purchasing the relevant patent). Another option is to wait until the patent at issue expires. This might be satisfactory if the patent is expiring soon.

Contact Revision Legal

For more information or if you have an invention or design that you want to patent, contact the patent lawyers at Revision Legal at 231-714-0100.

Extra, Extra!
Recent Posts

2025 Changes to Trademark Fees

2025 Changes to Trademark Fees

Trademark

There are some significant changes coming to the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) that will affect trademark filings beginning January 18, 2025. These changes include the introduction of the Trademark Center, new fees, and revised application requirements. Here is an overview of the key changes: The USPTO will retire the TEAS system, which […]

Read more about 2025 Changes to Trademark Fees

Automated Decision-Making Technology: California Releases Proposed Regulations

Automated Decision-Making Technology: California Releases Proposed Regulations

Internet Law

In today’s competitive e-commerce landscape, automated decision-making technology is becoming more and more important. From personalized product recommendations to targeted advertising and streamlined logistics, these systems help ecommerce businesses adapt and grow. But new regulations are on the horizon, and these changes could reshape the way e-commerce businesses use automation. The California Privacy Protection Agency […]

Read more about Automated Decision-Making Technology: California Releases Proposed Regulations

FTC Adopts Final “Click to Cancel Rule”

FTC Adopts Final “Click to Cancel Rule”

Internet Law

The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) has issued final amendments to its trade regulation rule concerning negative option plans, also known as the “click to cancel rule.” This rule aims to address widespread deceptive practices that prohibit customers from cancelling services in the same manner in which they signed up. Here’s a detailed summary of the […]

Read more about FTC Adopts Final “Click to Cancel Rule”

Put Revision Legal on your side