Is My Proposed Trademark Inherently Distinctive? featured image

Is My Proposed Trademark Inherently Distinctive?

by John DiGiacomo

Partner

Trademark

Inherently distinctive trademarks are the best type of trademark and they are the easiest trademarks to successfully register with the US Patent & Trademark Office (“USPTO”). In general, trademarks are words, phrases, designs, logos or other things that are used on products (or with services) to uniquely identify a commercial source for the products (or services). To function as a trademark, the trademark must create — in the minds of consumers — an association between the trademark and the product/service. In general, something that is distinctive is something that is memorable to the consumer. There is a spectrum of distinctiveness commonly described as the following:

  • Generic, general or common word/mark trademarks — examples might be a triangle as a mark or a common word like “BLUE” — these either do not function as trademarks or are not distinctive
  • Descriptive trademarks — an example might be a word mark like “COMPUTER REPAIR SERVICES” — these trademarks merely describe the product/service and are not distinctive
  • Suggestive — an example is “AIRBUS” for an airline — it is suggestive of the service, but does not precisely describe the service — these types of trademarks are usually distinctive, but not the most distinctive
  • Fanciful or arbitrary — examples include “GOOGLE” and “EXXON” — these are inherently distinctive, the most distinctive type of trademark

When evaluating whether your proposed trademark is distinctive, the foregoing categories can be used in the analysis.

Note that there are many techniques for converting a common work trademark or symbol into something distinctive. For example, one technique is to use purposeful misspellings. So, instead of “FISH & TACKLE” for fishing, hunting and sporting goods products, you can use “PHISH & TAKL.” This will be a distinctive trademark particularly if coupled with a unique, stylized font. With purposeful use of misspellings, due regard should be given for how consumers use the internet to find and purchase products. PHISH & TAKL may be a distinctive trademark, but consumers will have to remember the misspellings when they type out their search. Of course, extensive and repeated use of the common words on your website can help resolve that problem. A similar technique can be used with numbers. Thus, “GR8 FENCING” instead of “GREAT FENCING” for a fence product and installation company.

Once you have created a distinctive trademark, there are a number of other legal concerns before you can begin using your new trademark. The most important is that your proposed trademark is not already in use by another business. Likewise, your proposed trademark cannot be confusingly similar to an existing trademark being used. In general, this will require an exhaustive trademark search which involves searching the market and the USPTO’s website for existing uses of your mark, logo, design or words/phrase. Whether a proposed trademark is confusingly similar requires some deep legal experience with trademarks and trademark infringement law. Thus, it is best to have an experienced trademark lawyer assist with the trademark search. For more information or if you have questions about creating and registering a trademark, contact the trademark lawyers at Revision Legal at 231-714-0100

Extra, Extra!
Recent Posts

The Minnesota Consumer Data Privacy Law: What Businesses Should Know (Part Two)

The Minnesota Consumer Data Privacy Law: What Businesses Should Know (Part Two)

Internet Law

In May 2024, Minnesota enacted the Minnesota Consumer Data Privacy Act (“MCDPA”). In Part One of this two-part article, the Consumer Data Protection Attorneys at Revision Legal discussed the consumer rights and consumer-facing business obligations imposed by the MCDPA, including additional consumer rights related to automated decisions that utilize profiling data. The MCDPA allows consumers […]

Read more about The Minnesota Consumer Data Privacy Law: What Businesses Should Know (Part Two)

Advantages of Forming Corporate Entities for Operating Your Business

Advantages of Forming Corporate Entities for Operating Your Business

Corporate

Under most circumstances, the experienced Business Lawyers at Revision Legal deem it prudent for clients to operate their businesses through a corporate entity like a standard corporation or a limited liability company. Of course, there are some circumstances where a partnership of some type might be the better option, but it would be a rare […]

Read more about Advantages of Forming Corporate Entities for Operating Your Business

The Minnesota Consumer Data Privacy Law: Summary For Consumers

The Minnesota Consumer Data Privacy Law: Summary For Consumers

Internet Law

In May 2024, Minnesota enacted a consumer data privacy statute called the Minnesota Consumer Data Privacy Act (“MCDPA”). About 20 States have enacted consumer data privacy statutes similar to the MCDPA, and the MCDPA follows the general template of those statutes. However, there are some unique and additional features of the MCDPA that are very […]

Read more about The Minnesota Consumer Data Privacy Law: Summary For Consumers

Put Revision Legal on your side