Trademark Distinctiveness vs Trademark Descriptiveness: What is the Difference? featured image

Trademark Distinctiveness vs Trademark Descriptiveness: What is the Difference?

by John DiGiacomo

Partner

Trademark

Trademarks are words, phrases, marks, logos or designs that are placed on packaging and goods that identify a unique commercial source for the goods and/or services being sold. The identification is in the minds of the consuming public. To be effective, a trademark must be distinctive. Distinctiveness may be considered as a continuum, ranging from trademarks that are highly distinctive — like GOOGLE for internet search engine services — to trademarks that are not distinctive at all — like TIRES TIRES TIRES for a tire sale and repair shop. Somewhere toward the non-distinctive side of the continuum are descriptive trademarks — like PENCILS as a trademark for an office supply store.

Whether a trademark is distinctive or descriptive depends on the goods or services with which the trademark is associated. For example, the trademark APPLE is merely descriptive for a farm that sells fruits and vegetables. But the trademark APPLE is distinctive for a company that sells computers and computer-related products.

Some types of trademarks are inherently distinctive. These are typically denoted as:

  • Fanciful trademarks — these tend to be trademarks that are created names or words like GOOGLE, PEPSI or EXXON
  • Arbitrary – these tend to be trademarks using common words but applied to unexpected or unusual products or services like APPLE for computers or OLD CROW for whiskey

There is a final category on the continuum of trademark distinctiveness that is sometimes inherently distinctive but sometimes veers into merely descriptive. These are called suggestive trademarks. The USPTO considers a suggestive trademark to be one that, when associated with various goods or services, “requires imagination, thought, or perception to reach a conclusion as to the nature of those goods or services.” That is, a suggestive trademark suggests what the goods or services are, rather than immediately tells the consumer what they are. Examples include AIRBUS and SPEEDI-BAKE for baking dough. Incongruity is often a factor that makes a trademark suggestive rather than merely descriptive. An example here is TENNIS IN THE ROUND for tennis sports facilities.

Generally speaking, trademarks that are merely descriptive of the goods or services may not be registered by the US Patent & Trademark Office (“USPTO”) on the Principal Register. By contrast, distinctive trademarks can almost always be registered. There is an exception for descriptive trademarks if it can be shown that, over time, the trademark has acquired distinctiveness in the minds of consumers. A good example here is AMERICAN AIRLINES which is merely descriptive, but over time, it came to be distinctive in the minds of consumers.

The USPTO considers a trademark to be merely descriptive if the trademark “describes an ingredient, quality, characteristic, function, feature, purpose, or use of the specified goods or services.” For example, the trademark DAIRY FARMS is descriptive since it describes the characteristics of business (that is, a farm producing and selling dairy products). Descriptive trademarks also include ones that identify the expected or intended user of the goods or services. Thus, the USPTO held that MOUNTAIN CAMPER was merely descriptive of a mail catalog that sold camping supplies and equipment.

Contact Revision Legal

For more information or if you have questions about creating and registering a trademark, contact the trademark lawyers at Revision Legal at 231-714-0100.

Extra, Extra!
Recent Posts

2025 Changes to Trademark Fees

2025 Changes to Trademark Fees

Trademark

There are some significant changes coming to the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) that will affect trademark filings beginning January 18, 2025. These changes include the introduction of the Trademark Center, new fees, and revised application requirements. Here is an overview of the key changes: The USPTO will retire the TEAS system, which […]

Read more about 2025 Changes to Trademark Fees

Automated Decision-Making Technology: California Releases Proposed Regulations

Automated Decision-Making Technology: California Releases Proposed Regulations

Internet Law

In today’s competitive e-commerce landscape, automated decision-making technology is becoming more and more important. From personalized product recommendations to targeted advertising and streamlined logistics, these systems help ecommerce businesses adapt and grow. But new regulations are on the horizon, and these changes could reshape the way e-commerce businesses use automation. The California Privacy Protection Agency […]

Read more about Automated Decision-Making Technology: California Releases Proposed Regulations

FTC Adopts Final “Click to Cancel Rule”

FTC Adopts Final “Click to Cancel Rule”

Internet Law

The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) has issued final amendments to its trade regulation rule concerning negative option plans, also known as the “click to cancel rule.” This rule aims to address widespread deceptive practices that prohibit customers from cancelling services in the same manner in which they signed up. Here’s a detailed summary of the […]

Read more about FTC Adopts Final “Click to Cancel Rule”

Put Revision Legal on your side