What is a “Famous” Trademark and Why Does It Matter? featured image

What is a “Famous” Trademark and Why Does It Matter?

by John DiGiacomo

Partner

Trademark

Under federal trademark law, trademarks that are deemed to be “famous” are entitled to extra legal protection. Whether a trademark is “famous” is a factual determination that includes these non-exhaustive statutory factors:

  • The duration, extent, and geographic reach of advertising and publicity of the mark, whether advertised or publicized by the owner or third parties
  • The amount, volume, and geographic extent of sales of goods or services offered under the mark
  • The extent of actual recognition of the mark and
  • Whether the mark was registered under older versions of the Trademark Act and/or whether the trademark is listed on the Principal Register under current law.

See 15 U.S.C. § 1125(c)(2)(A). Courts have routinely identified several trademarks as “famous” including Budweiser beer, Camel cigarettes, Starbucks coffee, Pepsi, and Barbie dolls.

Time is often a key factor. Thus, new trademarks are generally not “famous.” But, a new trademark can quickly become famous if sufficient advertising and marketing resources are dedicated to making the trademark well-known among the relevant consuming public. The relevant consuming public is also an important consideration. A trademark can be basically unknown to the general public, but famous to consumers in a niche market. Sometimes (but not always) that is sufficient to make a trademark “famous” for purposes of trademark law.

Why having a famous trademark matters

If a trademark (or a confusingly similar trademark) is used by some person or entity other than the owner, the owner of the trademark may sue for trademark infringement. Only the owner of a trademark may use it. The underlying legal purpose is to protect consumers from being misled in their purchasing decisions. Consumer confusion is a key element that must be proven to win a trademark infringement case. As an example, the Pepsi trademark is associated with various carbonated beverages. Use of the Pepsi trademark with something wholly unrelated to carbonated beverages — like concrete or other other construction materials — might not be trademark infringement. In this example, likely, no consumers would be confused by the different uses of the trademark.

However, if a trademark is famous, it can be protected from dilution and/or tarnishment. The underlying legal purpose is to protect the trademark, not the consuming public. Thus, the famous Pepsi trademark might be diluted by allowing its use with construction materials (even if the public is not confused). Dilution generally occurs when the famous trademark begins to lose its ability to identify and distinguish the products/services with which it is associated. Imagine, for example, if hundreds of products and services were trademarked as “Pepsi.” Eventually, because the trademark is associated with hundreds of products/services, the trademark would stop functioning as an identifier for a unique commercial source. Tarnishment generally occurs when the trademark is used with something unpleasant or scandalous. A famous example is the use of a famous sports logo by an adult film actress during her performances. This was deemed to be unlawful tarnishment of a trademark.

For more information or if you have questions about creating and registering a trademark, contact the trademark lawyers at Revision Legal at 231-714-0100.

Extra, Extra!
Recent Posts

The Minnesota Consumer Data Privacy Law: What Businesses Should Know (Part Two)

The Minnesota Consumer Data Privacy Law: What Businesses Should Know (Part Two)

Internet Law

In May 2024, Minnesota enacted the Minnesota Consumer Data Privacy Act (“MCDPA”). In Part One of this two-part article, the Consumer Data Protection Attorneys at Revision Legal discussed the consumer rights and consumer-facing business obligations imposed by the MCDPA, including additional consumer rights related to automated decisions that utilize profiling data. The MCDPA allows consumers […]

Read more about The Minnesota Consumer Data Privacy Law: What Businesses Should Know (Part Two)

Advantages of Forming Corporate Entities for Operating Your Business

Advantages of Forming Corporate Entities for Operating Your Business

Corporate

Under most circumstances, the experienced Business Lawyers at Revision Legal deem it prudent for clients to operate their businesses through a corporate entity like a standard corporation or a limited liability company. Of course, there are some circumstances where a partnership of some type might be the better option, but it would be a rare […]

Read more about Advantages of Forming Corporate Entities for Operating Your Business

The Minnesota Consumer Data Privacy Law: Summary For Consumers

The Minnesota Consumer Data Privacy Law: Summary For Consumers

Internet Law

In May 2024, Minnesota enacted a consumer data privacy statute called the Minnesota Consumer Data Privacy Act (“MCDPA”). About 20 States have enacted consumer data privacy statutes similar to the MCDPA, and the MCDPA follows the general template of those statutes. However, there are some unique and additional features of the MCDPA that are very […]

Read more about The Minnesota Consumer Data Privacy Law: Summary For Consumers

Put Revision Legal on your side