What is the Trademark Counterfeiting Act? featured image

What is the Trademark Counterfeiting Act?

by John DiGiacomo

Partner

Trademark

Trademarks are protected in the US by both civil and criminal statutes. Civil lawsuits can be brought under the Lanham Act by private parties alleging trademark infringement. However, in appropriate circumstances, the government can bring criminal charges of trafficking the goods that infringe on protected trademarks. In this sense, trafficking is used in the same manner as trafficking in illegal drugs or similar criminal behavior.

Trafficking in trademarked goods is criminalized under the Trademark Counterfeiting Act. See 18 U.S.C. § 2320. Under subsection f(5), “trafficking” is defined to means “… to transport, transfer, or otherwise dispose of, to another, for purposes of commercial advantage or private financial gain, or to make, import, export, obtain control of, or possess, with intent to so transport, transfer, or otherwise dispose of.”

To obtain a conviction for trademark trafficking, the government must prove beyond a reasonable doubt one of the following:

  • The accused trafficked in goods or services and knowingly uses a counterfeit mark on or in connection with such goods or services OR
  • The accused trafficked in labels, patches, stickers, wrappers, badges, emblems, medallions, charms, boxes, containers, cans, cases, hang tags, documentation, or packaging of any type or nature, knowing that a counterfeit mark has been applied thereto, the use of which is likely to cause confusion, to cause mistake, or to deceive OR
  • The accused trafficked in goods or services knowing that such good or service is a counterfeit military good or service the use, malfunction, or failure of which is likely to cause serious bodily injury or death, the disclosure of classified information, impairment of combat operations, or other significant harm to a combat operation, a member of the Armed Forces, or to national security OR
  • The accused trafficked in a drug and knowingly uses a counterfeit mark on or in connection with such drug OR
  • Attempts or conspires to do any of the above in paragraphs (1) through (4)

As can be seen, the accused must KNOWINGLY engage in prohibited behavior. Thus, intent must be proven by the government. Further, that the trademark or service mark is a counterfeit. Note that because of how “trafficking” is defined, the sale of even one item that has a counterfeit trademark or service mark can be prosecuted.

The crime of trademark trafficking is a felony with a potential term of imprisonment and a $2 million fine for the first offense.

The Trademark Counterfeiting Act specifically allows an accused to defend against the charges by using any and all “defenses, affirmative defenses, and limitations on remedies that would be applicable in an action under the Lanham Act.” For example, invalidity or abandonment of a trademark are potential legal defenses under the Lanham Act. Thus, if an accused could prove either of those, then they might avoid conviction under the Trademark Counterfeiting Act. The government’s burden of proof is “beyond a reasonable doubt.” However, for legal defenses, the burden lies with the accused and must be shown by a “preponderance of the evidence.”

For more information or if you have questions about creating and registering a trademark, contact the trademark lawyers at Revision Legal at 231-714-0100.

Extra, Extra!
Recent Posts

2025 Changes to Trademark Fees

2025 Changes to Trademark Fees

Trademark

There are some significant changes coming to the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) that will affect trademark filings beginning January 18, 2025. These changes include the introduction of the Trademark Center, new fees, and revised application requirements. Here is an overview of the key changes: The USPTO will retire the TEAS system, which […]

Read more about 2025 Changes to Trademark Fees

Automated Decision-Making Technology: California Releases Proposed Regulations

Automated Decision-Making Technology: California Releases Proposed Regulations

Internet Law

In today’s competitive e-commerce landscape, automated decision-making technology is becoming more and more important. From personalized product recommendations to targeted advertising and streamlined logistics, these systems help ecommerce businesses adapt and grow. But new regulations are on the horizon, and these changes could reshape the way e-commerce businesses use automation. The California Privacy Protection Agency […]

Read more about Automated Decision-Making Technology: California Releases Proposed Regulations

FTC Adopts Final “Click to Cancel Rule”

FTC Adopts Final “Click to Cancel Rule”

Internet Law

The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) has issued final amendments to its trade regulation rule concerning negative option plans, also known as the “click to cancel rule.” This rule aims to address widespread deceptive practices that prohibit customers from cancelling services in the same manner in which they signed up. Here’s a detailed summary of the […]

Read more about FTC Adopts Final “Click to Cancel Rule”

Put Revision Legal on your side