What is a Service Mark (and How is it Different From a Trademark)? featured image

What is a Service Mark (and How is it Different From a Trademark)?

by John DiGiacomo

Partner

Trademark

A service mark is similar to a trademark. Indeed, in many respects, they are the same. A trademark is some combination of a word, mark, symbol, group of words, logo, or a design that is used on products, packaging, advertising, and other materials to identify a unique commercial source of goods or products. A trademark also serves to distinguish one commercial source of goods from a different source of the same or similar type of goods. By contrast, as the name implies, a service mark is some combination of a word, mark, symbol, group of words, logo or a design that is used on packaging, advertising and other materials to identify a unique commercial source for services.

There are many similarities between trademarks and service marks. For both types, they must function as unique identifiers to consumers. Both can be registered with the United States Patent & Trademark Office (“USPTO”) and other state and foreign governmental bodies that register trademarks and service marks. The USPTO does not evaluate the legal sufficiency of a trademark differently than a service mark. For example, it is difficult to successfully register a “merely descriptive” trademark such as BLUE WATER OYSTERS. It is similarly difficult to successfully register a “merely descriptive” service mark such as GREAT LAKES DELIVERY. Further, the USPTO does not have a separate application for service marks and there is no separate Register for service marks. In short, in most respects, trademarks and service marks are the same.

That being said, there are some salient differences. By their nature, goods and products are tangible and services are intangible. This means that trademarks can be placed ON the goods and products being sold in commerce, while such is not the case with service marks. This, then, leads to one difference between trademarks and service marks during the registration process. When a business or firm applies for registration, specimens of “use in commerce” must be supplied with the application. Generally, with trademarks, one specimen of use that must be provided is evidence of use ON the product itself. By contrast, such specimens of use are not available for service marks. For service marks, specimens of use are limited to packaging, advertising, signage, websites and the like.

This brings us to another difference in the registration process which involves identification of the international classes of goods/services. When a trademark or service mark is registered, as part of the application, the owner must identify one (or more) of 45 classes of goods/services with which the mark will be used. For example, Class 25 is for trademarks used with various types of clothing and similar products. Classes 1 through 34 are for trademarks related to physical products. Classes 35 through 45 are for service marks. For example, shipping and travel services are grouped under Class 39.

Extra, Extra!
Recent Posts

Can I Trademark a Non-English Word or Phrase in the U.S.?

Can I Trademark a Non-English Word or Phrase in the U.S.?

Trademark

Yes, as long as the proposed trademark meets the other requirements for registration. U.S. trademark laws do not require that only the English language can be used for trademarks. However, whatever the language, trademarks must meet the legal requirements, including functionality, distinctiveness, uniqueness, etc. For example, every trademark must function as a trademark in that […]

Read more about Can I Trademark a Non-English Word or Phrase in the U.S.?

California’s Age-Appropriate Design Code Act Declared Wholly Unconstitutional

California’s Age-Appropriate Design Code Act Declared Wholly Unconstitutional

Internet Law

In a new ruling, a California federal judge has declared the entirety of California’s Age-Appropriate Design Code Act (“CAADCA”) to be unconstitutional. Cal. Civ. Code §§ 1798.99.28 et seq. See media report here and the Opinion here. The case is Netchoice, LLC. v. Bonta, Case No. 22-cv-08861-BLF (US N.Dist. Cal, March 13, 2025). The CAADCA […]

Read more about California’s Age-Appropriate Design Code Act Declared Wholly Unconstitutional

Put Revision Legal on your side