The Lanham Act, the federal law governing trademarks, specifically prohibits the registration of trademarks that fall into a number of categories. For example, Section 2(e) lists the following types of marks that are precluded from registration:
These marks are refused registration because they are relatively weak marks on the overall spectrum of trademark strength. In other words, trademark law prevents a weak marks from registration because it would be inequitable to permit someone to block others from using a common mark in connection with the offering of goods or services.
The Section 2(f) Exception
However, Section 2(f) trademark registration serves as an exception to this rule. Under this section, a mark that was initially refused registration based on the rules above can proceed to registration provided the mark “has become distinctive of the applicant’s goods in commerce.”
How do you prove a mark has achieved distinctiveness? If the mark has been used exclusively and continuous for more than 5 years, there is a presumption it has become distinctive. As a result, a simple sworn statement to continuous use will permit the mark to proceed to registration. If the mark has been used for less than five years, the applicant will need to submit evidence proving the mark has acquired distinctiveness. This could include a wide range of information, including advertising expenses, marketing plans, and formal surveys.
So, is there a downside to a Section 2(f) registration?
A Section 2(f) could be an admission the mark is not “inherently distinctive,” thus requiring you to establish secondary meaning in any subsequent litigation. While this is important, it is likely obtaining the federal registration itself is more important.
If you are faced with a decision about whether to accept a Section 2(f) registration or debating responding to an office action, you should consult with an attorney. Revision Legal’s experienced trademark attorneys can be reached at 855-473-8474.
In May 2025, as part of a settlement of litigation involving college football, a new entity was created called the College Sports Commission (“CSC” or “Commission”). See news media reports here and here. Among many other purposes, the CSC will monitor and approve name, image, and likeness (“NIL”) agreements for college athletes. As the term […]
Read more about Fairness Factors For Your College NIL Agreement
Trademarks are words, designs, symbols, logos, and other things that are used/associated with goods or services that identify the specific commercial source of the goods/services. COCA-COLA, APPLE, and GUCCI are just a few famous examples. If COCA-COLA is on the bottle, consumers know what to expect from the beverage in the bottle. The same for […]
Read more about Is a “Fanciful” Trademark the Best Type of Trademark?
Getting an endorsement deal as a social media influencer may be a seminal event financially and for the progress of your career. However, the question always has to be asked whether your endorsement deal is fair. In other words, are you getting paid what you are worth? There are a number of factors that can […]
Read more about Is Your Social Media Influencer Endorsement Deal Fair?