Clients often ask how they can get a website content copyright. Filing for copyright registration for website content can be tricky because website content changes on a regular basis. Though it can be tricky, it is important to file for a website content copyright because the value of website content can be difficult to prove in litigation. Since copyright registration provides the registrant with the ability to obtain statutory damages of up to $150,000 per work infringed, registration provides measurable benefits to website content owners.
To file for registration of website content, it is best to speak with a copyright lawyer. Since a copyright registration deposit is a snapshot in time, and because a registration extends only to the content contained within the deposit, it is important to work with a copyright attorney to identify a registration plan that will meet the specific needs of the website owner. For many websites, it may make sense to register for copyright protection on a quarterly basis to ensure that statutory damages are available.
If you seek advice on obtaining a website content copyright, contact our expert copyright attorneys today 855-473-8474.
Online affiliate marketing is big business now. Affiliate marketing, of course, has been around for a long time. Basically, a business or a person agrees to promote and recommend a product, a brand of products, or even a whole business in exchange for various things of value. Generally, the affiliate does not actually sell the […]
Read more about The Dos and Don’ts of Online Affiliate Marketing
Yes, as long as the proposed trademark meets the other requirements for registration. U.S. trademark laws do not require that only the English language can be used for trademarks. However, whatever the language, trademarks must meet the legal requirements, including functionality, distinctiveness, uniqueness, etc. For example, every trademark must function as a trademark in that […]
Read more about Can I Trademark a Non-English Word or Phrase in the U.S.?
In a new ruling, a California federal judge has declared the entirety of California’s Age-Appropriate Design Code Act (“CAADCA”) to be unconstitutional. Cal. Civ. Code §§ 1798.99.28 et seq. See media report here and the Opinion here. The case is Netchoice, LLC. v. Bonta, Case No. 22-cv-08861-BLF (US N.Dist. Cal, March 13, 2025). The CAADCA […]
Read more about California’s Age-Appropriate Design Code Act Declared Wholly Unconstitutional