Preemptive Rights in LLC Membership Interest Sales featured image

Preemptive Rights in LLC Membership Interest Sales

by John DiGiacomo

Partner

Corporate

Preemptive rights are related to the ownership percentages of corporate entities like corporations and limited liability companies (“LLCs”) if and when said entity issues additional ownership/membership interests. Say, for example, that a member of an LLC currently has a 10% membership interest. For ease of math, assume 100 membership interests have been issued. If the LLC plans to issue an additional 100 membership interests, then, as can be seen, without preemptive rights, current members will see their percentage ownership diminish. This generally goes under the concept of dilution of ownership rights.

Legally, preemptive rights are contained in contractual agreements. In many LLCs, preemptive rights are set forth in the operating agreement (or other formation documents). Preemptive rights can also be contained in separate contractual agreements. The mechanism is generally simple. A preemptive rights agreement will give current members the option of obtaining a pro-rata share of any membership interests that are issued. Thus, for our example above, the member would be entitled to buy 10% of the newly issued membership interests. In this way, that particular member would maintain its 10% ownership interest. Preemptive rights may be limited to certain types of circumstances. For example, preemptive rights often exclude situations where additional membership interests are issued for incentive-based reasons — such as granting membership interests to well-performing employees.

When additional membership interests are issued, generally, a certain time frame — 30 to 90 days — is provided for current members to exercise their preemptive rights. This time frame will be set forth in the agreement. Failure to purchase the pro-rata share of newly issued membership interests will be deemed a waiver of preemptive rights.

If preemptive rights are deemed important to an owner/investor, due diligence is needed to ensure those rights are clearly stated in the operating agreement or in another agreement. Many states have statutory provisions negating preemptive rights unless stated in an agreement. See, for example, this provision in the Delaware Code:

“Unless otherwise provided in a limited liability company agreement or another agreement, a member shall have no preemptive right to subscribe to any additional issue of limited liability company interests or another interest in a limited liability company.” 6 Del. Code, § 18-305(e)

Preemptive rights are more common with LLCs than with corporations. This is because corporations generally issue different classes of stock, some of which allow for voting rights and other classes just entitle the shareholder to dividends and other types of profit sharing.

Preemptive rights are important for matters of control because certain corporate decisions will require approval from certain levels of the members. For example, the operating agreement may require a majority vote of the members for the purchase of real estate. Dilution of voting power can impact a member’s ability to exercise control over the company. Dilution of voting power may also negatively impact a member’s influence with respect to who is appointed as General Manager for the LLC. This is key since LLCs tend to grant their General Managers extensive control of the company. Obviously, dilution of membership interests also impacts expected profit distributions and any proceeds from an anticipated sale of the LLC.

Right of First Refusal vs. Preemptive Rights: Understanding the Difference

Preemptive rights and rights of first refusal (ROFR) are related but distinct protections for LLC members, and they often appear together in well-drafted operating agreements. Preemptive rights apply when the LLC issues new membership interests — they give existing members the right to buy a proportionate share of the new issuance before outside parties can acquire those interests. Rights of first refusal, by contrast, apply when an existing member seeks to sell or transfer their current membership interest — they give other existing members or the LLC itself the right to purchase the transferring member’s interest on the same terms offered by a third-party buyer.

Together, these provisions protect existing members from both dilution (through new issuances) and from having an unwanted outside party suddenly become a member of their LLC. Without both protections, a 30% member in a closely held LLC can find their ownership diluted by new issuances and their co-members replaced by strangers through secondary transfers. LLCs with meaningful outside investors or key employee members should have both preemptive rights and ROFR provisions clearly articulated in the operating agreement.

Pricing New Membership Interests: Valuation Issues in Preemptive Rights Exercises

When a member exercises their preemptive right to purchase pro-rata new membership interests, the price per interest must be determined. This is straightforward if the LLC is issuing new interests at a fixed price in connection with a third-party investment round — the existing member simply pays the same per-unit price as the outside investor. It becomes more complicated when new interests are being issued for non-cash consideration (such as services, IP, or property), when the interests carry different rights than existing interests, or when the LLC’s valuation is disputed.

Operating agreements should specify how the price for newly issued interests will be determined for preemptive rights purposes, whether a member can exercise preemptive rights in part (rather than for their full pro-rata share), and what happens if a member declines to exercise their preemptive right in full — does the LLC offer the unexercised portion to other existing members before offering it to third parties? These provisions should be negotiated carefully at the time the operating agreement is formed, when the parties are cooperating, rather than litigated later when relationships have deteriorated.

Statutory Defaults and Why You Cannot Rely on Them

As noted in the Delaware Code provision cited above, Delaware — like most states — does not grant preemptive rights to LLC members by default. If the operating agreement is silent on preemptive rights, no such rights exist. Michigan’s LLC Act (MCL § 450.4210) takes the same approach: preemptive rights in an LLC are purely contractual and must be expressly stated. New York’s LLC Law § 504 similarly permits, but does not require, preemptive rights provisions. Even in states that grant default preemptive rights to shareholders in corporations (see, e.g., Michigan’s Business Corporation Act § 622), those corporate default rules do not carry over to LLCs.

Investors and members acquiring interests in existing LLCs must review the operating agreement carefully before investing to confirm whether preemptive rights are included. It is a common error — particularly for minority investors who focus on financial terms — to assume that preemptive rights exist without verifying them in the operating agreement. An attorney reviewing the operating agreement before any LLC investment should specifically flag whether preemptive rights are present, their scope, and any limitations.

Enforcing Preemptive Rights: Remedies for Violation

If a member’s preemptive rights are violated — meaning the LLC issues new membership interests without offering the protected member their pro-rata opportunity to purchase — the remedies available depend on the operating agreement and applicable state law. Possible remedies include: (1) rescission of the improper issuance, returning the LLC to its pre-issuance membership structure; (2) specific performance requiring the LLC to offer the issuance to the protected member at the original price; (3) monetary damages representing the value of the diluted ownership interest and the lost opportunity to maintain ownership percentage; and (4) declaratory judgment clarifying the member’s rights going forward. Courts have consistently held that preemptive rights provisions are enforceable as contractual obligations, and injunctive relief to prevent the consummation of an improper issuance is available when the violation is imminent and damages would be an inadequate remedy. Members who suspect their preemptive rights are about to be violated should seek emergency legal counsel immediately.

Contact the Business and Corporate Attorneys at Revision Legal

For more information, contact the experienced Business and Corporate Lawyers at Revision Legal. You can contact us through the form on this page or call (855) 473-8474.

Extra, Extra!
Related Posts

Received a Website Tracking Demand Letter? What Businesses Need to Know About CIPA and Pixel Litigation

Received a Website Tracking Demand Letter? What Businesses Need to Know About CIPA and Pixel Litigation

Revision Legal

Businesses across the country are opening demand letters alleging that their websites violate California privacy laws by using common tracking technologies — the Meta Pixel, Google Analytics, TikTok Pixel, session replay tools, and advertising cookies. These letters often threaten class action litigation under statutes such as the California Invasion of Privacy Act (CIPA), the Electronic […]

Read more about Received a Website Tracking Demand Letter? What Businesses Need to Know About CIPA and Pixel Litigation

The Legal Documents You Need When Starting Up Your Online Business

The Legal Documents You Need When Starting Up Your Online Business

Revision Legal

Launching an online business is exciting. It is also easy to skip the legal groundwork in the rush to get a product or service in front of customers. That decision tends to be costly. The legal documents your online business needs are not bureaucratic formalities — they protect you from liability, give you enforceable rights […]

Read more about The Legal Documents You Need When Starting Up Your Online Business

AI Shopping Assistants in E-Commerce: What Legal Risks Should Businesses Watch For?

AI Shopping Assistants in E-Commerce: What Legal Risks Should Businesses Watch For?

Revision Legal

AI-powered shopping assistants are no longer a novelty. From product recommendation engines to real-time chatbots that guide customers through purchases, e-commerce businesses of every size are deploying these tools to boost sales and reduce support costs. But with that adoption comes a set of legal risks that many retailers haven’t fully thought through. Before your […]

Read more about AI Shopping Assistants in E-Commerce: What Legal Risks Should Businesses Watch For?

Put Revision Legal on your side