If you have been targeted by libel in the Internet space, then it is important that you contact a libel attorney immediately. Libel in the Internet does not go away if it is not removed; in fact, it may be republished to many other websites without your knowledge or control. This is why it is important to address libel in the Internet as soon as possible.
A good libel attorney will identify both legal and non-legal leverage and strategies to have the libelous statements removed from the Internet. A good libel attorney will be familiar with the standard defenses to a claim of libel, such as Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, as well as the common forms of libel, such as libel per se and libel per quod. Since Internet service providers are often protected by Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, a libel attorney will also understand the most recent search tools to identify the poster of the libelous statements so that these statements can be address directly with the poster and not the Internet service provider.
If you have been targeted by libel in the Internet, contact the libel lawyers at Revision Legal today at 855-473-8474 or click here.
Online affiliate marketing is big business now. Affiliate marketing, of course, has been around for a long time. Basically, a business or a person agrees to promote and recommend a product, a brand of products, or even a whole business in exchange for various things of value. Generally, the affiliate does not actually sell the […]
Read more about The Dos and Don’ts of Online Affiliate Marketing
Yes, as long as the proposed trademark meets the other requirements for registration. U.S. trademark laws do not require that only the English language can be used for trademarks. However, whatever the language, trademarks must meet the legal requirements, including functionality, distinctiveness, uniqueness, etc. For example, every trademark must function as a trademark in that […]
Read more about Can I Trademark a Non-English Word or Phrase in the U.S.?
In a new ruling, a California federal judge has declared the entirety of California’s Age-Appropriate Design Code Act (“CAADCA”) to be unconstitutional. Cal. Civ. Code §§ 1798.99.28 et seq. See media report here and the Opinion here. The case is Netchoice, LLC. v. Bonta, Case No. 22-cv-08861-BLF (US N.Dist. Cal, March 13, 2025). The CAADCA […]
Read more about California’s Age-Appropriate Design Code Act Declared Wholly Unconstitutional