What Exactly is Form 83(b) and Why Should I File One With the IRS? featured image

What Exactly is Form 83(b) and Why Should I File One With the IRS?

by John DiGiacomo

Partner

Corporate

Form 83(b) is a form that is signed and sent to the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) making a choice — an election — on when the signatory would like to be taxed on future-vesting equity, like shares stock, issued by a corporate entity. By sending Form 83(b), the signatory chooses to have the equity taxed during the tax year when the equity was granted. Form 83(b) must be sent within 30 days of the equity grant. If Form 83(b) is not sent within those 30 days, then the grantee is taxed in the tax year when the equity vests.

Whether to make a Form 83(b) election depends on several factors including the value of the equity at the time of the grant, the expected value of the equity at the time of vesting, the cash-liquidity of the taxpayer at both times and the expected value and potential saleability of the equity at some future date. These variables matter because the value of the equity at the time of granting (or vesting) will be taxed as ordinary income, but any appreciated value of the equity will be taxed later as capital gains. Currently, the top tax rate for ordinary income is 37%, while the long-term capital gains rate remains at 20%. Note further that the tax on the value of the equity grant will be assessed regardless of the fact that the equity is or might be sale-restricted and might not be easily converted into cash.

For these reasons, many choose to make the Form 83(b) election at the time the equity is granted. But not always.

As a simple example, assume that the taxpayer receives a grant of 100,000 shares of stock which will vest in two years and which cannot be sold for a year after vesting. At the time of the grant, the value of the shares is 1¢. The shares are expected to be worth $1.00 in two years and, hopefully, worth $2.00 at the three year mark. At the time of the grant, the value of the stock is $1,000 — 100,000 times 1¢. If Form 83(b) is filed within 30 days of the grant, then the taxpayer will be taxed in that tax year on $1,000 in value at the ordinary income rate for an extra tax of $370 (assuming the top rate). By contrast, if Form 83(b) is NOT sent, then in two years, the taxpayer will be taxed on the value of the stock at the time of vestiture. If expectations were met and the value of the stock has risen to $1.00, then the value of the stock will be $100,000 and the taxpayer will be taxed on that value, in that tax year, at the ordinary income rate. That would be a tax liability of $37,000 (assuming the top rate). Note, again, that the tax is assessed regardless of the fact that, in our example, the equity was not sold and cannot be sold for another year. This shows why many choose to make the Form 83(b) election at the time the equity is granted.

For purposes of a taxpayer’s ability to PAY the tax, it might be as simple as saying a tax liability of $370 vs. $37,000. But, to see the overall tax consequences, we must include the capital gains tax. Capital gains tax is calculated from the initial tax valuation. So, if 100,000 shares are granted and then Form 83(b) is filed, the 100,000 shares are taxed at 1¢ and, therefore, have an initial capital gains value of $1,000. Assuming expectations have been met, at the year-two mark, the shares have increased in total value by $99,000. If sold at the two-year mark, that would result in a long term capital gains tax on that $99,000 at 20% which would result in a tax liability of $19,800. So, the proper comparison is $370 + $19,800 vs. $37,000. (Of course, there is no capital gains tax liability until the 100,000 shares are sold.) In our hypothetical, even considering the capital gains tax implications, it is clearly better to make the 83(b) election.

Contact Revision Legal

For more information or if you need legal help with business matters, contact the business lawyers at Revision Legal at 231-714-0100.

Extra, Extra!
Recent Posts

California: Retailers Must Warn That Digital Goods Can Be Taken Away

California: Retailers Must Warn That Digital Goods Can Be Taken Away

Internet Law

California Assembly Bill No. 2426, recently enacted into law, introduces significant amendments to the Business and Professions Code, specifically targeting consumer protection against false advertising in the realm of digital goods. This legislation, approved by the Governor on September 24, 2024, aims to address the misleading practices often associated with the sale of digital goods, […]

Read more about California: Retailers Must Warn That Digital Goods Can Be Taken Away

E-Commerce Package Protection May Violate Insurance Law

E-Commerce Package Protection May Violate Insurance Law

Internet Law

E-commerce business owners often look for ways to increase their cart size to in turn increase the revenue of their business. Many resort to adding package protection, a form of warranty or guaranty that a package will arrive undamaged. However, many of these package protection products may run afoul of state insurance law. E-commerce merchant […]

Read more about E-Commerce Package Protection May Violate Insurance Law

Challenges in Protecting Children’s Online Privacy: COPPA and TikTok

Challenges in Protecting Children’s Online Privacy: COPPA and TikTok

Internet Law

Protecting the privacy of children’s online personal data is complicated and challenging. The problems are made more difficult by the fact that, seemingly, children are happy to skirt and evade the various efforts made by online platforms to protect their privacy and by the fact that data collection businesses are happy if those efforts succeed. […]

Read more about Challenges in Protecting Children’s Online Privacy: COPPA and TikTok

Put Revision Legal on your side