Partner
Online shoppers factor pricing into almost every purchase decision. A bold “50% off” banner or a countdown timer can be all it takes to convert a browser into a buyer. But as useful as aggressive pricing tactics can be for driving sales, there is a legal line that e-commerce businesses cannot afford to cross. In the U.S., pricing is more than a marketing tool — it is regulated at both the federal and state level. If your pricing creates a misleading impression of cost or savings, you may face consequences that go well beyond customer complaints.
Deceptive pricing in e-commerce happens when a product is priced or presented in a way that misleads consumers about its true cost or value. This includes inflating a regular price to make a discount look more attractive, suggesting savings that do not actually exist, or hiding mandatory fees until the final step of checkout. The Federal Trade Commission Act prohibits unfair or deceptive acts in commerce, and the FTC has made clear that this prohibition applies directly to online pricing practices.
If you advertise a product as “on sale,” that sale must be genuine. If fees apply, they cannot be buried until the buyer is ready to confirm a purchase. The FTC and state consumer protection agencies have taken enforcement action against businesses that used phantom discounts, misleading price comparisons, and other deceptive tactics — and those actions have resulted in injunctions, civil penalties, and disgorgement of profits.
Advertising a product as discounted from an original price that was never actually charged in regular sales is one of the most common forms of deceptive pricing. If you have been selling a product at $29.99 for the past year but list a “was $59.99” reference price, that reference price is false and creates an illusion of savings that does not exist. The FTC requires that any “former” or “original” price used in an advertisement reflect a genuine prior offering: the product must have been offered at that higher price, in good faith, for a meaningful period before the discount was advertised.
Bait and switch means promoting a product at a low price to attract customers, then steering them to a more expensive alternative because the original item is supposedly unavailable or inadequate. In e-commerce, this can take the form of advertising out-of-stock products that were never available at the advertised price, or product listings that redirect buyers to upsells after the initial click. When a customer arrives expecting one price and is pushed toward something more expensive, that is a textbook bait-and-switch scenario.
Displaying a low upfront price but adding mandatory charges — processing fees, service fees, handling fees — late in the checkout process is deceptive pricing. Consumers form purchase intent based on the advertised price. Springing significant additional charges after that intent is established misrepresents the actual cost and violates FTC guidance on clear disclosure. Several states, including California and New York, have enacted specific rules targeting undisclosed fees in consumer transactions, so this is an area with growing legal risk.
Drip pricing is a related tactic where costs are gradually revealed throughout the buying process, so the final price at checkout is significantly higher than the price initially shown. The consumer is “dripped” into a higher total step by step. Regulatory pressure on drip pricing has intensified in recent years, with the FTC publishing guidance and multiple states passing legislation specifically targeting it. If the price shown on a product listing is not the price the customer ends up paying, you need to evaluate whether your disclosure practices comply with current law.
Comparing your price to an inflated or outdated competitor price — to make your offer look better than it actually is — also qualifies as deceptive pricing. If you claim your product is $30 cheaper than a named competitor, that competitor’s price must be current and verifiable. Cherry-picked prices from obscure listings, outdated data, or prices in different markets or tiers are not legitimate bases for a comparison.
Countdown timers for “limited time offers” that reset every night, or “only 3 left in stock” warnings when inventory is deep, create artificial urgency that pressures consumers into decisions based on false information. If your “sale ends tonight” resets at midnight, it is not a sale — it is a manipulation tactic. Regulators and state attorneys general have pursued enforcement actions against businesses that used fake scarcity and false urgency as conversion tools.
The primary federal source of deceptive pricing law is the FTC Act, Section 5, which prohibits unfair or deceptive acts or practices in or affecting commerce. The FTC’s Guides Against Deceptive Pricing establish specific standards for reference pricing, comparative pricing, and discount advertising. Violations can lead to FTC enforcement proceedings, civil penalties, and injunctive relief requiring changes to business practices.
State laws add another layer of exposure. California’s price comparison rules require that a former price reflect the prevailing market price within three months preceding the advertised sale. New York, Illinois, and other states have their own consumer protection statutes with specific requirements around pricing disclosures. If your e-commerce business sells to customers in multiple states — which most do — you need to understand the requirements of each jurisdiction where your customers are located.
The safest approach is transparency. If a price or discount would confuse a reasonable customer, it needs clarification. Practically speaking:
Deceptive pricing claims can generate class action exposure, FTC investigations, and state attorney general actions. For online retailers, the stakes are especially high because the same tactic is often applied across thousands or millions of transactions simultaneously. Our internet law attorneys work with e-commerce businesses to audit pricing practices, review advertising copy, and respond to regulatory inquiries before they escalate into formal proceedings.
For more information about deceptive pricing compliance, contact the experienced Internet Law and E-Commerce Lawyers at Revision Legal. You can reach us through the form on this page or call (855) 473-8474.
Receiving a copyright infringement claim as an online retailer can be stressful. Learn what counts as infringement, what claimants must prove, your available defenses, and how to respond strategically.
Read more about How to Respond to a Copyright Infringement Claim Against Your Online Store
Unclear, outdated, or poorly implemented e-commerce contracts can expose your business to disputes and liability. Learn the most common contract weak spots and how to fix them before they backfire.
Read more about E-Commerce Contract Pitfalls: What to Do When Your Terms and Conditions Backfire
Learn how FTC deceptive pricing rules and California’s Business & Professions Code Section 17501 apply to online retailers using strike-through and discount pricing tactics.
Read more about FTC & California Discount Pricing Compliance: What Online Retailers Must Know