International Trademarks: Registering a Trademark Under Section 66(a) featured image

International Trademarks: Registering a Trademark Under Section 66(a)

by John DiGiacomo

Partner

Trademark

Trademark registrations at the federal level in the U.S. are processed and administered by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (“USPTO”). Mostly, the USPTO is for domestic persons and corporate entities who want to register domestic trademarks. However, the USPTO is also the agency responsible for registering international trademarks owned or held by persons/companies seeking to use their trademarks in the United States. The process of registering foreign-registered trademarks is simplified by U.S. trademarks and by international treaties. There are actually two categories for foreign trademarks. In this article, the experienced Michigan trademark attorneys at Revision Legal discuss registration under § 66(a).

Section 66(a) applicants can use the standard applications form. However, under the question of which “basis” is being used, the applicants should check the box for Section 66(a). Section 66(a) applications are for those that already have a registration for the foreign trademark through the World Intellectual Property Organization (“WIPO”), which is located in Geneva, Switzerland. Technically, a Section 66(a) application is a “request to extend protection” of the foreign registered trademark to the U.S. A request to extend protection can also be filed through the International Bureau of WIPO (in which case the International Bureau will transmit the request to the USPTO).

A Section 66(a) application must meet the legal requirements for registration of a trademark in the U.S. and will be examined by the USPTO in the same manner as other applications. A Section 66(a) application is also subject to the standard publication rules in the Official Gazette and can be challenged in an opposition proceeding before the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board.

The key exception to the standard requirements is that the international trademarks under do not have to be currently used in the U.S. However, the application must state a legitimate intent to use the trademark in U.S. interstate commerce. Within a couple of years, the applicant will need to file Use Affidavits or Excusable Nonuse Affidavits with the USPTO to maintain the registered extension of protection. Registered Section 66(a) trademarks are placed on the Principal Registry.

There are some well-known common problems that Section 66(a) applications face. These problems are generally a function of the differences in how trademarks are registered and used in different countries around the world. One common problem relates to the trademark Class and subclasses chosen for association with the trademark. In the U.S., trademarks must be associated with certain trademark Classes, like Class 016 for paper goods. Further, the trademark must be used with each Class. This is not the case in many other countries. As a consequence, a Section 66(a) application might list many Classes, but the trademark might only be used with a small number of the Classes identified. Identification of too many Classes can cause rejection by the USPTO and can cause significant problems with maintaining a Section 66(a) registration. Some other common problems include:

  • Failure to accurately and fully describe a design trademark
  • Language uncertainties — for example, how does the word or character function as a trademark?
  • Uncertainty with respect to the type of entity of the applicant — relates to how corporate entities are different from country to country
  • Improper disclaimers

Contact the Trademark Attorneys at Revision Legal

For more information, contact the experienced Trademark Lawyers at Revision Legal. You can contact us through the form on this page or call (855) 473-8474.

Extra, Extra!
Recent Posts

Does the AI-Copyright Legal Fight Represent a National Security Threat?

Does the AI-Copyright Legal Fight Represent a National Security Threat?

Copyright

The holders of copyrights for newspapers, magazines, books, and other publications are involved in numerous legal battles with owners of AI modules over alleged copyright infringement. The plaintiff copyright owners claim that the AI large language modules have been trained on huge quantities of copyrighted materials without permission and — most importantly — without payment. […]

Read more about Does the AI-Copyright Legal Fight Represent a National Security Threat?

How Does Buy-Sell Insurance Work For An Owners’ Agreement?

How Does Buy-Sell Insurance Work For An Owners’ Agreement?

Corporate

The owners of most small, closely-held businesses negotiate and sign some form of an “Owner’s Agreement.” An important part of such Agreements is the “Buy-Sell” provisions. These are often some of the most difficult to negotiate. The gist of the buy-sell part of the Owners’ Agreement is to establish the rules for what happens if […]

Read more about How Does Buy-Sell Insurance Work For An Owners’ Agreement?

Status on Social Media Moderation Statutes and Cases

Status on Social Media Moderation Statutes and Cases

Internet Law

Social media content moderation by technology platforms was one of the “hot” legal topics in 2023-2024. Three States — California, Texas, and Florida — passed different statutes to either require more content moderation (California) or to limit such moderation (Texas and Florida). All the statutes, in one way or another, demanded more transparency and information […]

Read more about Status on Social Media Moderation Statutes and Cases

Put Revision Legal on your side