Strategies for Claiming an Abandoned Trademark featured image

Strategies for Claiming an Abandoned Trademark

by John DiGiacomo

Partner

Trademark

Under US trademark law, an owner of a trademark must actually USE the trademark in interstate commerce for the trademark to continue being valid. Failure to use a trademark is the hallmark of an abandoned trademark. The US trademark law, the Lanham Act, defines trademark abandonment to occur when “its use has been discontinued with intent not to resume such use.” Both elements must be established. Further, evidence of nonuse for three consecutive years is prima facie evidence of abandonment. That is, if a person or business can effectively prove that a trademark has not been used for three years, that will be sufficient to prove that the trademark has been abandoned. At that point, the abandoned trademark can be claimed by another. Here are some strategies for claiming an abandoned trademark.

Do Your Research

Before embarking on an effort to claim an abandoned trademark, research is essential. As you conduct the research, organize and collect the results. Most of the results can be used as evidence of abandonment.

  • First, research who owns the trademark.
  • Second, determine if the owner is still in business. Consider whether some new owner might have acquired rights to the trademark.
  • Third, find out if the trademark is registered (including possible trademark registration at the state level). To claim a registered trademark, it will be necessary to have the registration canceled. Further, find out if the registration has been properly maintained. A trademark must be maintained with periodic filings with the US Patent & Trademark Office or the State-level trademark office. If the trademark registration has lapsed, that will be good evidence of abandonment.
  • Fourth, research the various products and/or services with which the trademark has been used. All registered trademarks must be associated with at least one class of goods or services.
  • Fifth, conduct extensive research on use of the trademark in commerce. Be sure to consider whether the trademark has been used in foreign markets. Document any time periods of nonuse. Ideally, the research will show at least three years of continuous nonuse.

Research Excusable Nonuse

There are some valid reasons that a trademark can still be valid even if there is nonuse. Under US trademark law, this is generally called “excusable nonuse.” Consider whether there are any grounds for excusable nonuse with respect to the trademark at issue.

Consider Buying or Licensing the Trademark

Depending on the results of the research, it might be possible to acquire the trademark from the owner or obtain a license to use the trademark. Sometimes, this option is less expensive than seeking to have the trademark canceled and then filing an application for registration.

Begin a Cancellation Proceeding and Prepare an Intent-to-Use Trademark Application

If the research demonstrates abandonment, the next step is to file a cancellation proceeding. This can be filed with the USPTO. Essentially, a complaint is filed along with all the collected evidence of abandonment. The owner of the trademark has an opportunity to respond and challenge the claim of abandonment. If the owner does not respond or cannot rebut the evidence of abandonment, the USPTO will cancel the registration of the trademark. At that point, the person or business seeking to claim the trademark can file an intent-to-use trademark application. If that is approved, then the abandoned trademark will have been successfully claimed and the new owner can begin using it. For more information, contact Revision Legal at 231-714-0100. Our litigation team has deep experience in trademark law,internet law and patent law.

Extra, Extra!
Recent Posts

Online Personal Data Privacy: Fight Over Universal Opt-Out Mechanisms

Online Personal Data Privacy: Fight Over Universal Opt-Out Mechanisms

Internet Law

Almost half of the States in the U.S. have enacted some version of an online personal or consumer data privacy statute. The statutes all use a similar framework that requires data collectors and processors to provide notices, obtain consent, and comply with mandates and prohibitions. For example, all of the online data privacy statutes require […]

Read more about Online Personal Data Privacy: Fight Over Universal Opt-Out Mechanisms

9th Circuit Partially Invalidates California’s Age-Appropriate Design Code Act

9th Circuit Partially Invalidates California’s Age-Appropriate Design Code Act

Internet Law

The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals — located in San Francisco — partially struck down California’s Age-Appropriate Design Code Act (“CAADCA”). See Cal. Civ. Code §§ 1798.99.28 et seq. The CAADCA was passed in 2022 by the California State Assembly. The CAADCA was enacted to protect the online privacy of children — persons under the […]

Read more about 9th Circuit Partially Invalidates California’s Age-Appropriate Design Code Act

Put Revision Legal on your side