Partner
To be successful under the ACPA, the owner of the mark must demonstrate that (1) the mark and the domain name are identical or confusingly similar, (2) the mark was distinctive when the domain name was first registered, (3) the trademark’s owner used the mark commercially before the domain name was registered, and (4) the domain registrant acted in bad faith and intended to profit from the trademark’s use.
As of today, the United States Supreme Court has not considered application of the ACPA. However, the ACPA has been looked at by many Circuit Courts across the US. The element often requiring the most analysis by the courts is in determining whether or not the domain registrant acted in bad faith. To aid in this analysis, Congress has included a list of nine factors in the ACPA for the court to consider. It is also noted that the list is not exhaustive and that the courts can consider additional factors they feel demonstrate elements of bad faith.
With all of this in mind, can the ACPA be of any help to you if you have been the victim of a domain theft? The answer, unfortunately, is no. Domain theft, or domain hijacking, is when someone steals your actual domain name, either for their own personal use or to sell it on the market and make a profit. Cybersquatting, which the ACPA specifically deals with, looks at when an individual legally purchases a domain name with the intent of selling it to the owner of the mark for an escalated price or for the purposes of “piggy-backing” off the popularity of the mark.
Sadly, there are still no statutes specific to domain theft, and only minimal case law, leaving this as an area of confusion and uncertainty for many.
For more information about domain name theft, what you can do if you have been a victim of it, and what the ACPA can do for you, contact Revision Legal’s Internet attorneys, specializing in Cybersquatting, through the form on this page or call 855-473-8474.
The answer to this question is complex and nuanced. In the last decade or so, it has become fashionable to insist there is some stark dichotomy between what a trademark is and what a brand is. But the difference is not as stark as some marketers would like you to believe. The traditional definition of […]
Read more about Is a “Trademark” the Same Thing as a “Brand”?
The Circle R and the TM symbols both relate to trademarks and both can be physically placed on products, packaging, advertising materials, websites, etc. The Circle R symbol is an “R” enclosed in a circle (®). While both are trademark-related symbols, there are different eligibility requirements for use, meanings, and implications. Here is a quick […]
Read more about Trademarks: What is the Difference Between the Circle R and TM Symbols?
E-commerce businesses must comply with federal and State-level advertising laws and regulations. This is true of any business. But e-commerce businesses face special challenges because there is a whole array of potential methods of innocently, accidentally, or intentionally violating advertising laws. These include the potential to engage in false and deceptive advertising practices, such as […]
Read more about Is Your E-Commerce Advertising in Compliance With Existing Laws?