Defamation Law: Libel Per Quod Definition, Examples, and Recourse featured image

Defamation Law: Libel Per Quod Definition, Examples, and Recourse

by John DiGiacomo

Partner

Internet Law

Under the law, a person or business may not make false statements that injure and/or harm the reputation of another person or entity. Legally, this is called “defamation” and, if you defame another, you can be sued and held liable for money damages to the victim of your defamation. Under Michigan law, a statement or communication is also considered defamatory if it tends to deter third persons from associating or dealing with the person or entity that has been defamed. False statements can be made in writing or via an oral statement. Legally, the former is called libel and the latter is called slander.

Defamation law has become particularly important in the internet age when many feel free to vent their personal frustrations by making false statements in consumer reviews, blog posts, via tweets and instagram uploads. But false statements on the internet can lead to litigation.

In most jurisdictions, defamation claims are divided into two types — defamation per quod and defamation per se. In Michigan, the difference turns on whether the victim of defamation is required to prove actual damages, injury, or harm from the false and defamatory statement(s). For example, in Michigan, to win a defamation case, the plaintiff (the person bringing the lawsuit) must provide evidence of four legal elements:

  • That the defendant made a false and defamatory statement concerning plaintiff
  • The communication was published to a third party without privilege
  • The fault amounting at least to negligence on the part of the publisher; and
  • Either (a) the statement is actionable irrespective of special or actual harm/injury (defamation per se) or (b) the statement’s publication caused special or actual harm caused to the victim (defamation per quod).

Under modern Michigan law, defamation per se involves only two types of statements — words imputing a lack of chastity to any female or male or words imputing the commission of a criminal offense. See Mich. C.L. §600.2911. For example, if an assistant manager of a Big Boy Restaurant, while other diners are present, loudly accuses certain patrons of being at the restaurant the day before and leaving without paying, the assistant manager has spoken words that impute a criminal offense. That is defamation per se and the victims do not need to provide evidence of special or actual harm/injury. See Burden v. Elias Bros. Big Boy Restaurants, 613 NW 2d 378 (Mich. Court of Appeals 2000).

In general, defamation per quod is any other type of defamation. For example, if a person is erroneously accused of being involved in an automobile accident by an insurance company, the false statement is defamation per quod. It is NOT defamation per se because the false statement did not involve words that imputed criminal conduct or lack of chastity. As noted, to win a defamation case involving per quod defamation, the victim must prove actual harm or damages. That is what happened in the case of Hall v. Citizens Ins. Co., 141 Mich. App. 676 (Mich. Court of Appeals 1985). In that case, the victim of defamation was named Patricia Hall. She had automobile insurance with Citizens Insurance, Co. (“Citizens”). But Citizens had also issued an insurance policy to a different Patricia Hall. There was an accident in 1973 involving the other Patricia Hall. But, Citizens sued the wrong Patricia Hall. Despite her many efforts to clear up the mistake, Citizens eventually won a default judgment and began garnishing Ms. Hall’s paychecks.

Ms. Hall eventually countersued against Citizens for defamation and other legal claims. After trial, the jury awarded Ms. Hall $1,500 on her defamation claim. On appeal, Citizens argued that Ms. Hall had not proven special or actual harm. However, the Court of Appeals disagreed. The court noted that “actual harm” includes not only out-of-pocket losses, but also damages for mental and emotional suffering. Ms. Hall had presented evidence of her emotional suffering and that was sufficient for her defamation claim. For more information, contact the trusted internet lawyers at Revision Legal at 231-714-0100.

Extra, Extra!
Recent Posts

Worrying About SaaS Agreements and Cross-Border Data Transfers

Worrying About SaaS Agreements and Cross-Border Data Transfers

Internet Law

When your business is contemplating a software-as-a-service (“SaaS”) agreement, there are a large number of considerations. An SaaS agreement is, of course, a subscription service where a software package is centrally hosted and accessed by a SaaS company’s customers. Issues to be aware of include: As important as the foregoing issues are, one often overlooked […]

Read more about Worrying About SaaS Agreements and Cross-Border Data Transfers

FAQs About Legal Services for Social Media Influencers, Bloggers, and Online Content Creators

FAQs About Legal Services for Social Media Influencers, Bloggers, and Online Content Creators

Internet Law

If you are serious about your career as a social media influencer, blogger, and/or online content creator, you ARE going to need legal services at some point. Online creation is big business now, and big business means the need for legal services. The Internet and Social Media Attorneys at Revision Legal are here to help. […]

Read more about FAQs About Legal Services for Social Media Influencers, Bloggers, and Online Content Creators

Take it Down Act: Ban on “Revenge Porn” Goes National

Take it Down Act: Ban on “Revenge Porn” Goes National

Internet Law

Congress recently passed the Take It Down Act (“TIDA”), and the law was signed by the President in mid-May 2025. See AP media report here. Interestingly enough, “Take It Down” is an acronym for “Tools to Address Known Exploitation by Immobilizing Technological Deepfakes on Websites and Networks Act.” TIDA prohibits what is commonly called “revenge […]

Read more about Take it Down Act: Ban on “Revenge Porn” Goes National

Put Revision Legal on your side