Copyright Attorney: 9th Circuit Rules MMS Is Not Copyright Infringement

In a strange copyright infringement case, the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals has ruled that MMS, the text messaging standard, is not an illegal file sharing service and, therefore, cell phone carriers cannot be held liable for vicarious copyright infringement for the forwarding of copyrighted MMS messages. Luvdart, a company that produces greetings and stylized messages containing video, photos, and audio, alleged that Verizon, AT&T, and Sprint could be held liable for profiting from the facilitation of the copyright infringement of Luvdart’s copyrighted messages. In short, Luvdart alleged that these carriers allowed users to forward Luvdart’s copyrighted MMS messages to third parties in violation of Luvdart’s copyright license agreement.

 

A three judge panel of the 9th Circuit ruled that Luvdart failed to state a claim upon which relief can be granted and upheld the lower court’s decision to dismiss the case. In affirming the lower court’s dismissal of the case, the 9th Circuit held that Luvdart failed to show that the carriers had specific knowledge that copyright infringement occurred on their respective networks. Specifically, the Court stated, “Luvdarts’s conclusory allegations that the Carriers had the required knowledge of infringement are plainly insufficient.” The Court also rejected Luvdart’s argument that the carriers were responsible for “willful blindness,” namely, that they took specific actions to avoid learning about infringement on their networks. And the Court took issue with validity of Luvdart’s purported notices under the Digital Millennium Copyright Act: “The notices were 150-page-long lists of titles, apparently just a transcription of every title copyrighted by Luvdarts, which indicated that they wanted “accountability” for the unauthorized distribution of those titles for the period from May 2008 to November 2009.”

 

What does this mean for you? Simply put, your phone carrier will not be held liable for copyright infringement simply because it allows users to forward MMS messages.

Extra, Extra!
Recent Posts

Does the AI-Copyright Legal Fight Represent a National Security Threat?

Does the AI-Copyright Legal Fight Represent a National Security Threat?

Copyright

The holders of copyrights for newspapers, magazines, books, and other publications are involved in numerous legal battles with owners of AI modules over alleged copyright infringement. The plaintiff copyright owners claim that the AI large language modules have been trained on huge quantities of copyrighted materials without permission and — most importantly — without payment. […]

Read more about Does the AI-Copyright Legal Fight Represent a National Security Threat?

How Does Buy-Sell Insurance Work For An Owners’ Agreement?

How Does Buy-Sell Insurance Work For An Owners’ Agreement?

Corporate

The owners of most small, closely-held businesses negotiate and sign some form of an “Owner’s Agreement.” An important part of such Agreements is the “Buy-Sell” provisions. These are often some of the most difficult to negotiate. The gist of the buy-sell part of the Owners’ Agreement is to establish the rules for what happens if […]

Read more about How Does Buy-Sell Insurance Work For An Owners’ Agreement?

Status on Social Media Moderation Statutes and Cases

Status on Social Media Moderation Statutes and Cases

Internet Law

Social media content moderation by technology platforms was one of the “hot” legal topics in 2023-2024. Three States — California, Texas, and Florida — passed different statutes to either require more content moderation (California) or to limit such moderation (Texas and Florida). All the statutes, in one way or another, demanded more transparency and information […]

Read more about Status on Social Media Moderation Statutes and Cases

Put Revision Legal on your side