In a recent case coming out of the District Court of Appeal for Florida, a lawyer was awarded damages after she was subject to libel and defamation online. Ann-Marie Giustibelli represented Copia Blake in her divorce proceedings against Peter Birzon. However, the tables were eventually turned when Blake fired Giustibelli and took to the Internet with her ex-husband Birzon to spew defamatory comments regarding Giustibelli’s services. The posts made claims of excess charges and that Giustibelli drew the proceedings out to get paid more.
Unsurprisingly, Giustibelli sued, and she won. During the trial, Blake and Birzon admitted that many of their comments were false, but suggested that because their statements were opinion, the First Amendment protection of free speech safeguarded them against prosecution. The court disagreed.
Despite agreeing with the lower court decision, the Court of Appeal wrote a decision suggesting that the issue “presents a scenario that will likely recur, and the public will benefit from an opinion on the matter.” The court held that the blog’s claims that Giustibelli falsified the contract between herself and Blake were actually factual allegations, and that the evidence proved that these claims were false.
The court didn’t address any of Blake and Birzon’s other arguments, finding that they had not been adequately briefed, weren’t preserved, or lacked in merit.
In this instance, Giustibelli was fortunate because she knew who was posting the comments online. Not everyone is so fortunate. Given the power of technology and the ability of an individual to post comments online without disclosing their identity, this can be a major challenge. For more information on how to proceed when you don’t know who is posting defamatory comments about you or your business, look at “Internet Defamation: Who Do I Sue if I Don’t Know Who Defamed?”
For more information about what options are available to and what can be done to have defamatory comments removed from Internet service providers, contact Revision Legal’s Internet Defamation attorneys through the form on this page or call 855-473-8474.
Image courtesy of flickr user brett jordan.
The answer to this question is complex and nuanced. In the last decade or so, it has become fashionable to insist there is some stark dichotomy between what a trademark is and what a brand is. But the difference is not as stark as some marketers would like you to believe. The traditional definition of […]
Read more about Is a “Trademark” the Same Thing as a “Brand”?
The Circle R and the TM symbols both relate to trademarks and both can be physically placed on products, packaging, advertising materials, websites, etc. The Circle R symbol is an “R” enclosed in a circle (®). While both are trademark-related symbols, there are different eligibility requirements for use, meanings, and implications. Here is a quick […]
Read more about Trademarks: What is the Difference Between the Circle R and TM Symbols?
E-commerce businesses must comply with federal and State-level advertising laws and regulations. This is true of any business. But e-commerce businesses face special challenges because there is a whole array of potential methods of innocently, accidentally, or intentionally violating advertising laws. These include the potential to engage in false and deceptive advertising practices, such as […]
Read more about Is Your E-Commerce Advertising in Compliance With Existing Laws?