Jerk.com: Actually A Jerk featured image

Jerk.com: Actually A Jerk

by John DiGiacomo

Partner

Jerk.com billed itself as the “anti-social network.” For a $30 membership fee, the site allowed users to vote on whether other people were jerks or not. The site also included the usual social network amenities, like a profile page and the ability to post and comment on updates. Users could also submit anonymous reviews about other users. However, over time, paid users discovered that they were not actually benefiting from their membership. In particular, paid members could not change information that was posted on the site.

In 2014, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) filed a complaint against Jerk, LLC and its creator John Fanning. The complaint stated that the website deceived consumers with claims that all of its profiles were user generated, and that it made false representations about the benefits of paid memberships. Jerk.com actually had very few users in comparison to its large number of profile pages. The site used a computer program to create profile pages with content that it acquired through Facebook searches.

On a 5-0 vote, the FTC ordered Fanning to delete all personal customer information that the company obtained during the website’s operation. The order also prevented Jerk, LLC from selling or releasing the information. The main objective of the complaint was to prevent further misrepresentation of the site’s content and membership. Fanning then petitioned the FTC’s order to the United States Court of Appeals.

The First Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the FTC’s ruling that Jerk.com misled customers about the benefits of a paid membership and the source of the site’s content. It was clear from the facts of the case that Fanning’s website used deceptive acts and statements to get customers to pay for membership on the site. The Court upheld the majority of the FTC’s order, which included notification of complaints related to deceptive statements and maintaining advertising and marketing records.

Social networking is a primary communication method for both personal and business-related activity. The case against Jerk.com shows how seriously the FTC and the federal courts take the threat of exposing users’ personal data. Consumers must be able to protect themselves and to avoid deceptive practices that can put their personal information at risk.

Contact Revision Legal’s team of experienced internet attorneys through the form on this page or call 855-473-8474.

 

Image courtesy of Flickr user Chris Potter

Extra, Extra!
Recent Posts

Esports Intellectual Property Lawyers: Gaming Law

Esports Intellectual Property Lawyers: Gaming Law

Internet Law

Like any business, esports businesses must protect their various forms of intellectual property (“IP”). IP can be valuable. Indeed, with some esports businesses, the largest component of their business valuation is their IP, including trademarks, copyrights, patent rights, domain name registrations, and trade secrets. IP can also include various assignments, licenses, and other permission-granting contractual […]

Read more about Esports Intellectual Property Lawyers: Gaming Law

E-Commerce Acquisition Lawyers

E-Commerce Acquisition Lawyers

Internet Law

Revision Legal is a law firm focusing on e-commerce and internet law with deep experience in providing legal services with respect to mergers and acquisitions of e-commerce businesses. E-commerce is, of course, businesses that make money online. But that “online” aspect presents unique legal and practical challenges for e-commerce acquisitions. Any business acquisition requires a […]

Read more about E-Commerce Acquisition Lawyers

Quality Control Requirements for Trademark Licensing

Quality Control Requirements for Trademark Licensing

Trademark

Trademark licensing can create valuable revenue streams for your business. Licensing has the advantage that your business retains possession of the trademark and can create more than one licensing regime over the life of your business. Licensing is also a method of expanding the reach (and value) of your trademark without the need to invest […]

Read more about Quality Control Requirements for Trademark Licensing

Put Revision Legal on your side