The Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB) has rejected a trademark application for registration of the term MOTT’S for use in association with baby food. In rejecting the trademark application, the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board found, under Section 2(e)(4), that MOTT’S is not an inherently distinctive surname due to fame. The TTAB noted that the surname Mott appears 5,819 times in a public database and argued that Samuel Mott’s, the founder of Mott’s, personal history was not notable enough to serve as an exception to the surname refusal, which requires a surname to correspond to a “historical person.”
Mott’s has obtained other trademarks in association with other products, but those registrations contain the surname “Mott’s” and an additional term. Here, Mott’s sought registration for the surname for use in association with a product that it had only been using for a short period of time. Consequently, Mott’s could not argue that it had acquired distinctiveness in the term through a longstanding use in commerce in association with baby food to support its application for registration.
If you seek a Trademark Trial and Appeal Board attorney, or if you seek trademark registration, contact the expert trademark lawyers at Revision Legal.
Online affiliate marketing is big business now. Affiliate marketing, of course, has been around for a long time. Basically, a business or a person agrees to promote and recommend a product, a brand of products, or even a whole business in exchange for various things of value. Generally, the affiliate does not actually sell the […]
Read more about The Dos and Don’ts of Online Affiliate Marketing
Yes, as long as the proposed trademark meets the other requirements for registration. U.S. trademark laws do not require that only the English language can be used for trademarks. However, whatever the language, trademarks must meet the legal requirements, including functionality, distinctiveness, uniqueness, etc. For example, every trademark must function as a trademark in that […]
Read more about Can I Trademark a Non-English Word or Phrase in the U.S.?
In a new ruling, a California federal judge has declared the entirety of California’s Age-Appropriate Design Code Act (“CAADCA”) to be unconstitutional. Cal. Civ. Code §§ 1798.99.28 et seq. See media report here and the Opinion here. The case is Netchoice, LLC. v. Bonta, Case No. 22-cv-08861-BLF (US N.Dist. Cal, March 13, 2025). The CAADCA […]
Read more about California’s Age-Appropriate Design Code Act Declared Wholly Unconstitutional